euanli said:I'm interested in knowing what email program searches pdf attachments for words.
That's a fair question, but I would expect a sysem search (Spotlight?) to do it, unless the PDF is really a scanned image.
-dB
euanli said:I'm interested in knowing what email program searches pdf attachments for words.
euanli said:I'm interested in knowing what email program searches pdf attachments for words.
Race Radio said:Moral's clinic does not have his name in it. It is a government funded clinic called Perfoma
JV has launched some heavy allegations against Lowe. This is either because he knows it is true or is in deep $hit and is trying to get ahead of the story. The most rational choice is he is confident in his position.
Race Radio said:Moral's clinic does not have his name in it. It is a government funded clinic called Perfoma
JV has launched some heavy allegations against Lowe. This is either because he knows it is true or is in deep $hit and is trying to get ahead of the story. The most rational choice is he is confident in his position.
BikeCentric said:Oh please, I would fire you for such a comment if you worked for me.
You search your e-mails for "Lowe" and then yes you OBVIOUSLY better open any attachments on the e-mails that come up. Otherwise you are not being thorough and display zero attention to detail. The fact that I have to explain this to you at all annoys me which is another reason why you're fired.
BroDeal said:If the Slipstream statement that describes the use of health checks is accurate then I do not find that JV did not look at the PDF unbelievable. The mail was CCed to him. He probably gets a large volume of CCed mail. Mail is sent to the person with responsibility to handle it, but JV gets CCed just in case he wants to micromanage something. For an organization the size of Slipstream, it is common to receive all sorts of stuff that you don't want to deal with in detail unless a problem flares up.
If the numbers are not used for Slipstream's internal processes then the only thing JV would be concerned about is whether the check was done and sent to the UCI. The e-mail could have been as simple as, "Hola, got my 3rd qtr health check done. The form is attached." The actual mail recipient woulb be the one responsible for sending the info the UCI. If the subject line was descriptive enough, JV might not have even read the mail body let alone opened the attachment.
BotanyBay said:I don't open every attachment sent to me. I need to first feel confident that opening it is safe. Or are you talking the "security team"?
euanli said:I'm interested in knowing what email program searches pdf attachments for words.
Cyclesport is on a roll.Moller said:Here's an very interesting take on this, http://www.cyclesportmag.com/news-and-comment/slipstream-more-questions-than-answers/
surprising to here cycle sport say anything critical of Vaughters.
BikeCentric said:We're talking about .PDF's here, not "every" attachment. Yeah, never open a .EXE but a .PDF is basically a locked text document. ....
BikeCentric said:We're talking about .PDF's here, not "every" attachment. Yeah, never open a .EXE but a .PDF is basically a locked text document. Not to mention we are talking about the context of knowing who it came from and what it's about but not actually opening the document.
Anyway, bottom line here IMHO is Garmin is not looking at all professional in how this is being handled. Even if Lowe IS indeed a crook and all their claims about him are correct Vaughters and co. still look inept and out of touch. I'm very disappointed. And BTW, I've got a thread I started on here years ago entitled "Can Jonathan Vaughters save Pro Cycling" so don't think I'm just a hater. When I say I'm disappointed I'm being very sincere.
BotanyBay said:Forget what Vaughters might have (or might not have noticed. What about friggin Prentice Steffen? HEL-LO, Steffen is the USPS doc that cried "doping foul" on the USPS squad after getting sacked. The two WORKED TOGETHER on USPS.
Moller said:Here's an very interesting take on this, http://www.cyclesportmag.com/news-and-comment/slipstream-more-questions-than-answers/
surprising to here cycle sport say anything critical of Vaughters.
Not Riding Enough said:.......
It is interesting that JV sacked White without talking to him when he "first found out" about the refereral. Why did JV automaticaly believe the word of TLowe? Especially if the result was a sacking? Sure White has since said it is true but how did JV know at the time?
Juicy McDrip said:It's surprising to hear ANYBODY being critical of Vaughters. Because currently, he is the White Knight. The Answer. The Cure to Cycling's ills.
JV is an example of Perception and Momentum vs. Reality. Simply stated, the bandwagon jumps on something or someone that seems to be above everything and have all the answers to today's problems.
Then the bandwagon turns once there is a weakness. Witness the swell developing against LA. Hero to Goat. And any other famous person with a hint of a problem has the same cycle. Sad, but it's the way the world watches, judges and feels good about their collective view.
JV knows that any "***** in the armor" could cause a similar swell. So, he's above it all, declaring White and others to be problematic.
Until the world sees JV as problematic. And we will. One article or "*****" at a time. It just takes time and some facts (preceived or real).
Momentum and Perception... Like his sideburns. Cool and different and better...for now, at least.
BikeCentric said:Oh please, I would fire you for such a comment if you worked for me.
You search your e-mails for "Lowe" and then yes you OBVIOUSLY better open any attachments on the e-mails that come up. Otherwise you are not being thorough and display zero attention to detail. The fact that I have to explain this to you at all annoys me which is another reason why you're fired.
Not Riding Enough said:'...'It is interesting that JV sacked White without talking to him when he "first found out" about the refereral. Why did JV automaticaly believe the word of TLowe? Especially if the result was a sacking? Sure White has since said it is true but how did JV know at the time?