Re:
meat puppet said:
^ I don't think its either or but both and when it comes to (microdose) epo and blood transfusions. The transfusion cycle basically requires epo to be effective under a heavy training load.
Refrigerated red cells endure ca four weeks. After that they need to be reinfused. Frozen they can last longer, but some loss of rbcs is expected using this method. It is also more expensive.
As a separate observation..... Watched several editions of amstel and fleche during the week on YouTube from 1999 on. It is quite astonishing how markedly the anthropometry of the riders and the top contenders in particular changes over the years. To wit, they become a lot thinner. This is not something new of course, but the change becomes very pronounced when the footage from 20 or so years is compressed like so. One illustrative example would be the disappearance of riders with body types like bettini from the finales of hilly classics. Another is comparing say valverde from 2005 to the current version.
Surely they are more "professional" these days.
this is why Gerrans was so effective in these decimated sprints like Amstel in the past 6 years, he did not do the lipotropin weightloss, he had all the muscle at his ~66ish kgs, 14lbs give or take at 5'7".
He went from getting his doors blown off by Valverde and Gilbert, to beating them. This off-season, he looked about ~4 lbs leaner, I reckon that is not smart, this route will hurt his terminal velocity. Matthews also lost the weight the last years, then he could hang on the hilly classics, but still get his doors blown off now by Sagan and Van Avermaet.
Remember, Michael Matthews won a bunch sprint at Vuelta, was effective at bunch kicks, placing top 5 in Giro and Vuelta, but does not have the terminal velocity of perennial second place finisher in the bunch kicks Peter Sagan.
The thing about the weight losss, it is a page from Princeton mathematician John Nash' Game Theory which won him the nobel prize in economic. <think> triangulation, compare yourself to all of your competitors, as individuals, and their individual strengths. Gerro maintaining his terminal velocity but managing to hang on the hilly classics, meant he had the finishing speed to win. When before, he had speed, and was competitive in the decimated sprints, but would not be able to beat someone like Valverde, or a Bartoli, or a Rebellin. But then when everyone loses the weight, and does not have the muscle for the explosiveness in the last 5 kms, Gerro starts to win. But he lost a couple of lbs this off-season, but my eye's visual perception.
the lipotropin and the liquid rectal nutrition diet of Team Sky that Race Radio told us about, that means the last ~3lbs, you lean up even more.
This is more than just clen and corticosteroids.
It is a combination of that, but mostly lipotropin, AICAR, GW, and the rectal liquid nutrition inserted straight into the lower intestine. That means the final pounds.