Ich habe kein Problem mit der Nützung der deutschen Sprache, aber vielleicht wäre es besser für den Anderen, Englisch zu nützen.
Another example of what I was saying above is that as soon as somebody involved in the Italian cycling authorities claimed Valverde was involved in Humanplasma, several people on this forum immediately jumped and stood by that and continued the ongoing dogpile on Valverde, because a coin toss has decided that he should be hated while other known dopers aren't such a problem. Never mind that, other than the statements of one person - who has an axe to grind in the situation - there is as yet no evidence in the public domain to prove it. That's not important, because as we all already know that Valverde is, was or has been, a doper, we'll just lap it up and throw more abuse at him without bothering to substantiate it. It's human nature. Plenty of people have already come to the conclusion, "cycling is corrupt, cycling is full of drug cheats, Linus Gerdemann is a cyclist ergo he's a drug cheat", and this opinion is very common in Germany, a country rather disillusioned by cycling, so this is one of very few options open to Gerdemann in order to prove his innocence, if you like.
And on Valverde's being linked to Humanplasma - as I said on the thread about it when somebody said that the Spanish can rest easy because punishing those implicated falls to the national authorities, would a Spaniard really have to travel all the way to Austria if they wanted to dope?