• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Giant Defy Advanced vs Colnago m10

Apr 25, 2013
1
0
0
This may seem like a very odd comparison, as these 2 bikes are very different. I am looking to upgrade from an older Orbea Onix. I had thought I had found the bike I wanted in the Defy Advanced 2 with Ultegra components. I then walked in and talked to a guy in a shop who talked me into riding a 2012 Colnago m10. He mentioned what a comfortable bike this was for a race bike and that I should give it a try. I loved it, especially after putting a shorter head tube with a little rise on the bike.

While I am doubtful a lot of people have compared these two bikes, I would appreciate any input.
 
I used to have a Giant Defy, although not the advanced, then upgraded to a Colnago CLX-3.0, both standard setups that come with the bikes, but I upgraded the wheels on the new bike to Mavic Ksyrium.

The difference between the two cannot be bigger. The Colnago is far better in every respect, the first time I went out on it, I felt I was doing a different sport.

This is not really the best comparison though, because the Giant was not the same year as the Colnago. Having said that, I feel the Colnago is so good that I'm probably locked in for life now.

This is not coming from a Giant hater either, the Giant was a very reliable bike, and never failed me at all, great for the low price.
 
Mar 10, 2009
1,295
0
0
Never owned a Giant but I have 2 Colnagos. Neither an M10 but you will never be sad about owning one. They just do everything a race bike should do and do it well. They are built to last and are tough enough to survive racing.
My C-50 was raced for a year by a pro before I got it and it had been crashed like any pro's bike. I got it at the end of the 2007 season and the bike is absolutely as solid as new. I knew the bike was experienced but the seller had to give me new levers and the bars were bent when the bike arrived. It was a leap to buy a pro bike but the brand is so well built that I saved a fortune by accepting a little cosmetic damage and a new set of bars.
I know Giant makes more bikes but Colnago makes great bikes.
 
Jun 15, 2010
1,318
0
0
Master50 said:
Never owned a Giant but I have 2 Colnagos. Neither an M10 but you will never be sad about owning one. They just do everything a race bike should do and do it well. They are built to last and are tough enough to survive racing.
My C-50 was raced for a year by a pro before I got it and it had been crashed like any pro's bike. I got it at the end of the 2007 season and the bike is absolutely as solid as new. I knew the bike was experienced but the seller had to give me new levers and the bars were bent when the bike arrived. It was a leap to buy a pro bike but the brand is so well built that I saved a fortune by accepting a little cosmetic damage and a new set of bars.
I know Giant makes more bikes but Colnago makes great bikes.

I was looking at either an M10 or C59 but the dealer told me that he had a few M10s that cracked.
I have ordered a C59 in Maserati Blue.
 
Jun 20, 2009
654
0
0
simo1733 said:
I was looking at either an M10 or C59 but the dealer told me that he had a few M10s that cracked.
I have ordered a C59 in Maserati Blue.

Hmmm, I have multiple Colnagos including a C59 Italia, but not an M10. My contacts hve made no mention on M10s cracking and I have to say I would be very surprised given Colnago's legendary QA. Not saying the dealer didn't tell you that, just that I doubt he got it right.

But Guiseppe Magnetico/RVD4ROUBAIX will know - any news Beppe?