Armchair Cyclist
Moderator
Re: Re:
I suspect they didn't think that it was necessary in the case of riders with no TT pedigree, so no expected chance of a stage result, and nothing to gain in GC.
The Conti/Ulissi situation (and Pedersen's) seems so blatant and preplanned that the punishment seems very lenient, time penalties for those for whom GC time is irrelevant and essentially simply saying "you are not allowed to benefit from cheating". To allow them to escape with a position essentially the same as it would be had they had not cheated is not punishment.
search said:Leinster said:wirral said:Ulissi went out one minute after his team mate Conti, who immediately lost a minute, and then they worked as a pair.
Didn’t they used to separate teammates in the start list just to prevent exactly that happening?
it's still possible, even the Giro regulations themself say "In the case that two or more riders belonging to the same team should result in consecutive starting order, the Commissaries’ Panel could change that order by inserting competitors from other teams who are immediately preceding or following them in the general classification."
Yesterday they did not though, for whatever reason
I suspect they didn't think that it was necessary in the case of riders with no TT pedigree, so no expected chance of a stage result, and nothing to gain in GC.
The Conti/Ulissi situation (and Pedersen's) seems so blatant and preplanned that the punishment seems very lenient, time penalties for those for whom GC time is irrelevant and essentially simply saying "you are not allowed to benefit from cheating". To allow them to escape with a position essentially the same as it would be had they had not cheated is not punishment.