- May 11, 2013
- 13,995
- 5,289
- 28,180
According to Rai Nibali lost 16 seconds to Fuglsang on the climb, maybe he took it easier on the climb.
All are within seconds on the climb, the difference will be made on the rest of the parcours.
According to Rai Nibali lost 16 seconds to Fuglsang on the climb, maybe he took it easier on the climb.
Judging by the red zone graphics, he's been holding back a bit.According to Rai Nibali lost 16 seconds to Fuglsang on the climb, maybe he took it easier on the climb.
I guess this is the first place I read it but seriously, at this point it's shocking this even has to be stated. Nibali does this every single time and people overreact about his first split every single timeNegative split, you heard it here first!
Nibali's engine doesn't love that 500W 3 minute climb in first part of ITT.I guess this is the first place I read it but seriously, at this point it's shocking this even has to be stated. Nibali does this every single time and people overreact about his first split every single time
His second check is not promising either.Nibali's engine doesn't love that 500W 3 minute climb in first part of ITT.
I hope.
WTF Almeida?!
Quickstep TT magic.
Nibali's engine doesn't love that 500W 3 minute climb in first part of ITT.
I hope.
The 90 seconds he lost on Tuesday are the 90 seconds Fuglsang doesn't lose today it seems.Nibali still behind Fuglsang in time check 2.
Almeida +7 at time check 1.
