Fred R. - 05/10/2010:
Dear Graham:
I remember in late-2001 when you were quoted in either Procycling or CycleSport, levying a rather harsh judgment on the "worthiness" of Oscar Freire's 2nd World Championship. You seemed to be complaining that he wasn't the kind of rider you thought worthy of wearing the jersey because he was invisible for most of the season, but could somehow find a way to pop-up and take the big prize from whichever riders you considered more-deserving. I'm sorry I can't quote you exactly, but I'll never forget the shock I felt because I thought you wouldn't want to be on record openly disparaging a rider whose image you'd need to capture throughout the following year... Maybe you thought Freire would never READ what you said, since it was published in English... Regardless, do you still play favorites amongst the riders, or do you now strive for more neutrality in your public statements and try to limit the perception that you favor any one particular athlete, or that you hold someone in contempt based purely on their ability to peak for one particular race? Thanks! FF
05/11/2010:
Strong words Fred - and you have a good memory! Freire won this year's Milan-San Remo, and I had the exact same thoughts as 2001, if that was when it was... Have you seen Freire since San Remo..? No. He's a boring cyclist who hides away all year then pops up and wins - and wins well. My comments in 2001 compared Freire to champions like Eddy Merckx and Rik Van Looy and others who won three world titles as well as multiple Classics and stage-races. Freire does not have a place in that world...but watch for him in Geelong this October! GW