heal: Giro 2015
hurt: Giro 2013
Okay, why do people think the 2010 Vuelta was 3.4 times better than the 2011 Tour?
The 2011 Tour had two days with the best long range full gas GC mountain action of a Tour in this century, while the 2010 Vuelta was just forgettable. A few murito wins for Antón, a crash for GC leader Antón, cycling history's worst TT for a GC leader with Purito and a Nibali win by default.
A little tip. It's better to underline text than bold it because if you have set the forum to nighttime vision it's very hard to see the difference between normal and boldfaced text (and it was only a coincidence that I actually noticed you had highlighted something).
And you may have a point but the 2013 Giro just died, and the 2014 Tour is not looking to feisty, either. So I don't think it can be only explained by the fact that Nibali won.
2010 Vuelta was distinctively better than the year before and after. It's also basically the start of the Murito era of La Vuelta with the Valdepenas side by side 3 way uphill sprint.I remember Vuelta 2010 distinctively and I'm surprised it made it this far.
It was an extremely boring edition.
I mean, at least Vuelta 2013 had Horner climbing entire mountains out of the saddle and the kamikaze version of Nibali on Angliru. It was a lot better and yet it's on the verge of elimination.
People, Giro 2013 already died with Netserk's post.
@richwallone @fiddlers need to update their post.