Gloin22 said:
And now personal question - was Giro's first week much better ? I don't think so.
First weeks are always ( usually/mostly ) boring at GT's.
Not THIS bad though.
2011 Vuelta: uphill finish at Valdepeñas de Jaén opened gaps, Sierra Nevada was rubbish, but at least sorted wheat from chaff
2011 Tour: TTT is a bunch of crap, but two small final climbs that are big enough to open time gaps, much tougher than Seraing and Boulogne-sur-Mer
2011 Giro: Stage 3 would have been a great first week stage had fate not intervened, then there was the strade bianche on stage 5
2010 Vuelta: Málaga stage was good with Gilbert, Valdepeñas de Jaén was keenly fought, plus the dreaded TTT
2010 Tour: cobbles and what could have been a really good Ardennes stage
2010 Giro: obstacle course to Middelburg, 2 TTs, one individual one team
2009 Vuelta: obstacle course and cobbles in the Netherlands
2009 Tour: tougher, longer ITT, wind, overlong TTT, the Montjuïc finish was more or less as tough as anything we've seen in this Tour so far but doesn't really merit counting as an uphill finish in anything other than desperation
2009 Giro: TTT, then an uphill sprint in San Martino di Castrozza and a wheat-from-the-chaff MTF in Alpe di Siusi
2008 Vuelta: 40km ITT and a Valverde stage plus Chavanel nicking the leader's jersey on intermediate bonus seconds
2008 Tour: Plumelec probably tougher than any finish in this race so far, a mid-length ITT and Super-Besse
2008 Giro: two short-to-mid uphill finishes (Agrigento and Contursi Terme) and a genuine medium mountain stage (Pescocostanzo) which opened up some pretty major GC gaps. Also, the break deciding a tough stage leading to Visconti's reign in pink.
All seem to have more going on than the 2012 Tour.