craig1985 said:
Last week I had my VO2 max test done, and it was at 65, so how does that compare to the guys in the peloton, or is it indeed quite good. or normal?
I'm not sure if this should be in the form and fitness subforum
As several people have mentioned, VO2 max is not enough even though it is a very good indicator of what you can achieve with proper training.
When I started racing again after age 40, I had a VO2 max around that figure, 65. It was enough to get reasonably good results with the junior-senior crowd, but no wins.
When I was around 20, i inferred from a variety of indicators that I probably had a VO2 max around 72. It was enough to win occasionnally, but not very often as I was/am so slow in the finish ( except uphill).
The next indicator of interest would be VO2 at lactate threshold, which tells you what fraction of your VO2 max you can sustain for a long period ( 1-2 hours). That is something you can increase substantially with appropriate training.
Now, 72 does not translate to a lot of power when you are only 60kg. So, you need to add something else if you are to be competitive with 70 kg guys. In my case, in my 20's, that was "instant recuperation" : after a max effort, I only needed seconds to be ready for a similar effort. Something that is of no use in a TT but invaluable in head to head confrontation.
So, I would say that with 65 VO2 max you have a pretty good competitive potential, specially if you are 70 kg or more and have something to add to it like a good sprint or something else, like a 3rd lung (I am thinking of a guy would could sustain a conversation even though he was just hanging on!)