This thread is for people who think Lance raced clean. So if you support Lance you can voice your opinion here. I don't have an opinion of his innocence or guilt but I will point out the reasons why we can believe Lance raced clean:
1. Over 500 tests and Lance never tested positive. It's tough to cheat 500 tests you can't argue with that...so logically it can seem unlikely that Lance cheated taking this into consideration.
I can find you atleast 10 high profile riders that can claim the same and they still came clean later on "without proof on them" that is if we count the real test number (120 test)
2. No video, sound recordings, recorded phone conversations, or pictures of Lance doping throughout his long career. This lack of evidence is a bit disturbing since he has been racing so long.
Because thats how dopers are caught right ?
3. Most of the witnesses seem to be ex dopers who might be making deals to stay in the cycling game so long as they lie and confess to Lance...even if it's not true.
Thats actually a lie ^^ since half of them would not have been convicted of doping
4. His peers seemed to have tested positive but Lance has not. Did his teammates not follow Lance's doping guide book? If they tested positive and Lance didn't...maybe they were the ones that were cheating and Lance wasn't.
There is a few test that shows armstrong doped (if we look at the values) we can only guess about why nothing happened, but he is not the first rider to get this treatment ^^
5. USADA review board has a questionable judge who was charged with indecent exposure. Say all you want but if you wanted a judge in your case you probably wouldn't ask this guy to be on the review board deciding your life's work was one big cheat.
Nobody would be convicted ever, if thats all it takes to get free ^^
6. 7 Tour De France titles are the cause of cheating. In all likelihood this is very doubtful. For one, you still have to get your body over Mount Ventoux. All the cheats in the world won't get you up that mountain in first place...not unless you strap a motorcycle motor on that bike lol.
I can remember several times, where the whole team was better than all others (even water boys did better than real climbers) a full doped team does alot, not to mention all the moto help Armstrong got ^^
7. Lance's Character throughout race and life doesn't seem like one that would cheat:
a) Had and fought through cancer
b) Started Livestrong and made a comeback tour for Livestrong
c) Good gestures throughout the tour like waiting for Ulrich when he crashed.
a) He doped and got cancer
b) after his doping comeback, he used fight against cancer as a front to look better... (who whould ever accuse a poor cancer victim)
c) I've seen plenty of armstrong moments where he intimidate other riders and being a ****
I have no opinion in this matter. But there are a lot of compelling reasons to believe Lance raced clean. So it's important to look at both sides of the argument. I prefer to believe Lance raced clean but I don't really know. It's just a good thing to look at both sides of the argument, and you really can't do that in the other thread.
All have their right to their own opinion, I respect that.. my opinion is that everone that believes Armstrong is clean is either. A) Lacks intelligens (also about cycling and big sport in general) B) need an american hero (sadly avg joe needs this to have a good life) C) got cancer and are sympathetic
Now this might sound harsh, but its not.. this is just my opinion, you are totaly entitled to yours, but if you look at old cases and cycling even science, you would know deep inside that he is a fraud...
Last comment, I don't hate Armstrong as such, I actually respect him for his effort (doped or not) since as you like to use as a comment "All doped anyway" the thing is.. most of those guys came clean and don't pressure young riders into hell where they might end up with getting cancer, Armstrong does.... in my opinion, he should face criminal charges for pushing riders into doping!! cancer kills people you know.