Il Lombardia 2015, Oct 4th

Page 7 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re: Re:

staubsauger said:
MatParker117 said:
WheelofGear said:
I'll love to see Rebellin pulling "a Horner" and win Lombardia. One of the few hilly classics he never won.

He seems to be in-form. And he will be there with his team.

Apparently RCS encourages CCC to not select certain members of there roster.
They welcomed back Basso and Vino, so they shouldn't be stupid on Rebellin now.
Yea, but Basso and Vino were on WT teams, so they didn't really have much say without reneging on their commitments with the UCI. With the wildcard teams they have more scope, and so they can exercise the power of saying "you can have the invite but only on this condition".
 
Re: Re:

Flamin said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
Flamin said:
In a hard classic? No way. Both Purito's wins in Lombardia were not 'hard classics'.

Which "hard classic" did Nibali win?

Was Lombardia easier or harder than Nibali's biggest one day race wins, the Trofeo Melinda and the GP Mig?

Yeah, let's totally ignore Lombardia 2010-11, Liège 2012, Sanremo 2012, Firenze...

Even if he didn't win any of them, I still rate it at least as high as what Purito has done.

This isn't horseshoes! How can a few almost wins (and no actual victories in the classics) be rated "at least as high" as multiple classic victories? That belief is just ludicrous!
 
Does anyone know which lineup teams are bringing? I was not able to found it anywhere, for me pitty is if Aru will not take part of Astana even he could be one of favourites

as for favourites, this year parcours is very nice and very hard, too hard for someone like Kwiatko, Yates or Wellens anyway in my opinion, civiglio will take them out if anyone really attacks, I am still wondering how good Nibali form really is, hard to say from performance of last month, in top one he should be able to make difference there but still will be hard to get rid of enough fast purito or valverde e.g.

as for discussion over Purito is of course more succesfull then Nibali in classics only not for being stronger, but for being faster in the end and in Firenze it could be different story if Nibali had not problems with crash, and how anyone could say purito was stronger there when he was barely able to hold Nibali wheel and only because of crash he was able to get some seconds in descent (which he would never gain on Nibali) and again he lost them in another climb, so be a little more realistic
 
Someone who wasn't in Richmond might be fresher and win.

On paper this is a course for the like of Costa, Nibali, Uran, Valverde and Purito. I think the very attacking nature of the first three will mean this course suits them more. Wellens and the Yates bros (Adam or Simon have the capabilities to win) and Bardet outsiders. Probably (hopefully) the race is too hard for Alaphillipe, Kwiat and the like. Hopefully too hard for Wellens too. Gilbert may do well but he is not what he once was, in 2010 he won the race on a slightly easier course in terrible weather, and this is harder but may not rain. Open race, but I expect the people who were good in Firenze 2013 to do well here.
 
Jun 30, 2014
7,060
2
0
hfer07 said:
Nibali should take this one without a problem, since his form is fresher in comparison to the other potential candidates. Great race to wind down the season :)
He should have stayed in Italy to avoid the jetlag, the WC route wasn't exactly great for a rider like Vincenzo.
The riders who didn't travel to America should have an advantage.
 
Mayomaniac said:
hfer07 said:
Nibali should take this one without a problem, since his form is fresher in comparison to the other potential candidates. Great race to wind down the season :)
He should have stayed in Italy to avoid the jetlag, the WC route wasn't exactly great for a rider like Vincenzo.
The riders who didn't travel to America should have an advantage.

Most riders are already in Europe anyway. It's a lot of time between the Worlds and Lombardia.
 
Re: Re:

Angliru said:
Flamin said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
Flamin said:
In a hard classic? No way. Both Purito's wins in Lombardia were not 'hard classics'.

Which "hard classic" did Nibali win?

Was Lombardia easier or harder than Nibali's biggest one day race wins, the Trofeo Melinda and the GP Mig?

Yeah, let's totally ignore Lombardia 2010-11, Liège 2012, Sanremo 2012, Firenze...

Even if he didn't win any of them, I still rate it at least as high as what Purito has done.

This isn't horseshoes! How can a few almost wins (and no actual victories in the classics) be rated "at least as high" as multiple classic victories? That belief is just ludicrous!

Multiple is 2... Twice on a lame parcours. Nibali has shown a much wider variety of skills.

Boonen won more monuments and classics than Cancellara, yet Cancellara is for me the better classics rider. But feel free to disagree :) and this discussion is pretty old btw.
 
Jun 30, 2014
7,060
2
0
You're right BigMac, it will probably be a factor in Milano - Torino, but it shouldn't be a problem for Lombardia.
 
Aug 16, 2013
7,620
2
0
When Purito is angry and irritated, he's at his best.

So he will win this bike race. Nibali 2nd ( ;) ) and Vuillermoz 3rd.
 
Aug 16, 2013
7,620
2
0
Re: Re:

Flamin said:
Angliru said:
Flamin said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
Flamin said:
In a hard classic? No way. Both Purito's wins in Lombardia were not 'hard classics'.

Which "hard classic" did Nibali win?

Was Lombardia easier or harder than Nibali's biggest one day race wins, the Trofeo Melinda and the GP Mig?

Yeah, let's totally ignore Lombardia 2010-11, Liège 2012, Sanremo 2012, Firenze...

Even if he didn't win any of them, I still rate it at least as high as what Purito has done.

This isn't horseshoes! How can a few almost wins (and no actual victories in the classics) be rated "at least as high" as multiple classic victories? That belief is just ludicrous!

Multiple is 2... Twice on a lame parcours. Nibali has shown a much wider variety of skills.

Boonen won more monuments and classics than Cancellara, yet Cancellara is for me the better classics rider. But feel free to disagree :) and this discussion is pretty old btw.

MSR is a even more lame parcours. So only Liege left.

Purito got a podium in the best and hardest Worlds of the last 10 years (Mendrisio). After attacking all day ;)
 
Re: Re:

Arredondo said:
Flamin said:
Angliru said:
Flamin said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
Which "hard classic" did Nibali win?

Was Lombardia easier or harder than Nibali's biggest one day race wins, the Trofeo Melinda and the GP Mig?

Yeah, let's totally ignore Lombardia 2010-11, Liège 2012, Sanremo 2012, Firenze...

Even if he didn't win any of them, I still rate it at least as high as what Purito has done.

This isn't horseshoes! How can a few almost wins (and no actual victories in the classics) be rated "at least as high" as multiple classic victories? That belief is just ludicrous!

Multiple is 2... Twice on a lame parcours. Nibali has shown a much wider variety of skills.

Boonen won more monuments and classics than Cancellara, yet Cancellara is for me the better classics rider. But feel free to disagree :) and this discussion is pretty old btw.

MSR is a even more lame parcours. So only Liege left.

Purito got a podium in the best and hardest Worlds of the last 10 years (Mendrisio). After attacking all day ;)

Lombardia with Villa Vergano is by far the lamest monument. A podium in MSR is unique for any gc rider in modern era. But whatever, the real discussion was about a hard and selective course, like this year's Lombardia, so we'll soon find out how the clearly better Purito will do vs Nibali :)
 
Aug 16, 2013
7,620
2
0
Re: Re:

Lombardia with Villa and Muro was at least a super hard classic, where the best rider won. MSR is just a lottery. A nice lottery, but still a lottery.

Nibali can handle a wider range of races. But Purito is just better in classics like Liege and Lombardia. Just live with it. The more climbing in a classic, the better Purito is comparing Nibali ;)

But hey, just keep saying Lombardia with Vergano is just a lame monument. I bet Nibali would have loved to win a monument like that :D