Race Radio said:
Never underestimate the willingness of the groupies to smear anyone that questions the myth
http://evolutionofanathlete.blogspot.com/2012/01/lance.html
According to that blogger if you are a Texan, a man’s man, a beer lover, a legendary seducer of beautiful women, have a bad a.s.s attitude (to confront bouncers) and a control freak then, by imputation, that person, being LA the wonderboy, should be given slack and exonerated for wrong doings.
He becomes more vitriolic on Gifford’s criticisms of Livestrong/LAF. He needs to be corrected that Livestrong/LAF did set out to be a cancer research organization and that the Foundation did not “always claimed that their top priority is the idea of survivorship”.
In 2005, circa the retirement of LA from pro cycling, Livestrong/LAF changed its fundamental direction to awareness to allegedly make Livestrong more Lance-centric to promote its founder to public office that he admitted in 2008 was the office of Texas Governor by 2014. To 2005 Livestrong/LAF operated as a tax exempt raiser of funds for cancer research.
The blogger fails to notice that Gifford reported Armstrong (improperly) profited from Livestrong/LAF through the Demand Media deal.
After the deal was criticized in the media, Armstrong donated his initial sale proceeds—roughly $1.2 million—to the foundation and said he planned to donate the rest, too.
Allowing this deal to go through in 2008 without being informed in the financial documents for that and following years would support the blogger’s claim:
Gifford suggests that Livestrong is corrupt
Gifford is correct if a suggestion can be drawn that the organization is corrupt if profits due to the Foundation were diverted to a board member.