- Jun 22, 2009
BroDeal said:Ah, so you are the culprit.
It is better for the more vicious arguments to take place in that thread than in others because the Armstrong thread can be avoided by those who don't want to deal with that constant battle.
The "be nice" LA thread makes it obvious that the CN people don't really have a clue about the dynamic of the forum. As I said before, it is drive by moderation. If they don't want members arguing about Armstrong, which they well because he polarizing, in the Armstrong thread then where do they expect such arguments to take place. It looks to me like Amster is aiming to acheive his goal of censoring any discussion of Armstrong that is not to his liking.
If nothing about Armstrong doping should be mentioned in the thread then that should be defined to include ridiculous claims that he raced clean.
I agree that if there have to be "vicious arguments" pro and con LA, these should as far as possible be limited to one topic.
Come on Bro, lighten up and cut it out. I am not for censoring discussion whether it's to my liking or not (I am not that arrogant or important!) , nor did I ask Susan or anyone else to post a 'clean' or 'nice' LA topic. The only suggestion I made was to close the original thread due to its size (and this suggestion was made yesterday before the thread deteriorated and was closed for other reasons), and to immediately continue with the exact same topic, except then Part 2 starting at 0 pages. That's all.