A lot of riders are leaving Columbia? Why? Has Cav completely p)ssed everyone off including his team-mates? Going to be hard pushed to win in 10 with a weakened leadout train. Thoughts? Discuss.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Susan Westemeyer said:Is there any reason to believe that he has made his teammates angry at him, or are you just trolling?
Various team management have said it was a question of money, that so many are leaving.
Susan
Susan Westemeyer said:Is there any reason to believe that he has made his teammates angry at him, or are you just trolling?
Various team management have said it was a question of money, that so many are leaving.
Susan
Animal said:What "potty mouth"? Sounds like a prissy yank talking to me.
Fragrant Harbourer said:There are definately some very good riders leaving Columbia, but leaving because of the Mouthy Scouser? No. His star is beyond a shadow of a doubt brighter than any of those leaving and Columbia aint going out of their way to keep these guys particualrly when you consider who long ago the inbound transfers were anounced . I reckon there would have been a few High Roaders looking about thinking whose contracts were not getting renewed.
And as to lack of a leadout train, his main lead out man is still there, Mark Renshaw. And besides, his best win of the season at Milan-San Remo came without a leadout train, although Hincapie did a great job of getting over the hills.
Big_Blue_Dave said:Now I know Scots get annoyed being called English, but Cavendish a Scouser? If so, i'm calling Millar a Brummie, and Cadel Evans a Kiwi, maybe i'll even say Lance Armstrong is Canadian.
Cav is a Manxman, which provides a good alliterative text for your mouthy friend there. But, on the other points you are right, except his lead out train was much more than Mark Renshaw, he tends to have 5 or 6 set him up for the final 5km or 6km depending on the run-in. Though as you mentioned MSR was done without the train and I think that performance gave too many teams and sprinters a knock in confidence as he showed the cycling world he can also do it when the course is a little tougher than a pan-flat last 20km.
The whole success of the team is bred through the confidence and camaraderie the team generate together, and this makes the riders desirable. But, as has been seen in the past, when riders move they don't necessarily go on to perform as well as before. So it remains to be seen how the movers do. Also, who team Columbia bring in will be interesting and what roles they all play within the team. Seeing as Joaquin Rodriguez is leaving Caisse D'Epargne he would be a good acquisition who could really benefit from the teams philosophy.
craig1985 said:The riders are only going to follow where the $$$$ are and the opportunities, especially those who have proven that they are worth it. Plus signing talented young riders is a lot cheaper then what they would have to pay EBH or Kirchin.
We only call Cadel a Kiwi when his performance is terrible. When hes riding well, he's and AussieBig_Blue_Dave said:Now I know Scots get annoyed being called English, but Cavendish a Scouser? If so, i'm calling Millar a Brummie, and Cadel Evans a Kiwi, maybe i'll even say Lance Armstrong is Canadian.