Looking for the latest race results? - We got you covered right here!
He cannot jump ship with any credibility. Probably the least worst option for him is fight it out. Loses credibility with either way.hrotha said:He's probably trying to decide whether he can still jump ship or whether he should barricade all the entrances and try to fight it out.
hrotha said:He's probably trying to decide whether he can still jump ship or whether he should barricade all the entrances and try to fight it out.
Do try and keep up with the news. Murdoch is selling Sky and 20th Century Fox to Disney. And James Murdoch - the team's sugar-daddy - is exiting the Murdoch empire. This is no longer the Sunday Times's problem...Benotti69 said:I would be pretty sure that Walsh is being directed by Sunday Times owners and they are probably trying to figure whether it is worth sponsoring a cycling team anymore and have they reached maximum exposure.
fmk_RoI said:Do try and keep up with the news. Murdoch is selling Sky and 20th Century Fox to Disney. And James Murdoch - the team's sugar-daddy - is exiting the Murdoch empire. This is no longer the Sunday Times's problem...Benotti69 said:I would be pretty sure that Walsh is being directed by Sunday Times owners and they are probably trying to figure whether it is worth sponsoring a cycling team anymore and have they reached maximum exposure.
Disney happily owned Miramax, despite knowing all the rumours...Benotti69 said:fmk_RoI said:Do try and keep up with the news. Murdoch is selling Sky and 20th Century Fox to Disney. And James Murdoch - the team's sugar-daddy - is exiting the Murdoch empire. This is no longer the Sunday Times's problem...Benotti69 said:I would be pretty sure that Walsh is being directed by Sunday Times owners and they are probably trying to figure whether it is worth sponsoring a cycling team anymore and have they reached maximum exposure.
So Sky are over, unless Disney wants them to ride with capes..........
thehog said:Any word from Walsh?![]()
Walsh investigated Froome before agreeing to ghost-write his autobiography The Climb in 2014. ‘At this point in the Armstrong story I had six people in the team saying he had doped, and loads of evidence. With Froome, nothing. So what am I supposed to do? Make it up? Just so I can seem like a real tough guy who believes in nothing when I think there is a really decent basis for trusting Sky and Froome? When Lance was telling you he was using an altitude tent, you find out he’s not and you realise he is a liar. Stuff like that hasn’t come out about Geraint Thomas, Chris Froome or Bradley Wiggins? With Armstrong there was always that flow of evidence.’
In the Armstrong era a generation of clean riders were let down by the drugs cheats. With Froome soaked in urine and spat at during the 2015 Tour, is there a danger that the current generation of riders is being let down in a very different way, by an aggressive suspicion that fails to acknowledge sporting achievement? ‘Yes, I think there is a real danger,’ Walsh says. ‘What happens in 15 years’ time when we become pretty convinced that Chris Froome did it all clean? Do we say we were terribly unfair? People who are accusing him will feel the questions are justified. I would say the questions are justified, but with no answers to justify the questions it should have stoppedat scepticism and not gone into suspicion, hostility and accusation
ruamruam said:He cannot jump ship with any credibility. Probably the least worst option for him is fight it out. Loses credibility with either way.hrotha said:He's probably trying to decide whether he can still jump ship or whether he should barricade all the entrances and try to fight it out.
red_flanders said:ruamruam said:He cannot jump ship with any credibility. Probably the least worst option for him is fight it out. Loses credibility with either way.hrotha said:He's probably trying to decide whether he can still jump ship or whether he should barricade all the entrances and try to fight it out.
He'll come out attacking Froome and pretending it's all news to him. 100%.
The Hitch said:I think Walsh like Swart will decide that a positive test for salbutamol is worth backing Froome over. It wasn't epo. Its a mistake. The scientists will prove it. The evil Contador (lazarus) fans are just trying to crucify "Jesus again"
He wont commit 100% though. He'll try to play both sides - attack froome a little, give himself a chance to escape out of this later, but ultimately he's too in love with Froome and too in love with his master Brailsford (I think betas like Walsh dont have the balls to turn on someone like brailsford) to truly turn on them just yet.
So the line lies somewhere on the very thin area between salbutamol and clenbuterol?The Hitch said:I think Walsh like Swart will decide that a positive test for salbutamol is worth backing Froome over. It wasn't epo. Its a mistake. The scientists will prove it. The evil Contador (lazarus) fans are just trying to crucify "Jesus again"
He wont commit 100% though. He'll try to play both sides - attack froome a little, give himself a chance to escape out of this later, but ultimately he's too in love with Froome and too in love with his master Brailsford (I think betas like Walsh dont have the balls to turn on someone like brailsford) to truly turn on them just yet.
The Hitch said:I think Walsh like Swart will decide that a positive test for salbutamol is worth backing Froome over. It wasn't epo. Its a mistake. The scientists will prove it. The evil Contador (lazarus) fans are just trying to crucify "Jesus again"
He wont commit 100% though. He'll try to play both sides - attack froome a little, give himself a chance to escape out of this later, but ultimately he's too in love with Froome and too in love with his master Brailsford (I think betas like Walsh dont have the balls to turn on someone like brailsford) to truly turn on them just yet.
He looked disturbed and wondering how Froome could get a 2000 reading with the inhaler saying "It looks bad,,,"Walsh appeared via webcam with a nice shot of his enlarged forehead, saying not much other than “this doesn’t look good”.
A modified version of his PDM defence:The Hitch said:I think Walsh like Swart will decide that a positive test for salbutamol is worth backing Froome over. It wasn't epo. Its a mistake. The scientists will prove it. The evil Contador (lazarus) fans are just trying to crucify "Jesus again"
He wont commit 100% though. He'll try to play both sides - attack froome a little, give himself a chance to escape out of this later, but ultimately he's too in love with Froome and too in love with his master Brailsford (I think betas like Walsh dont have the balls to turn on someone like brailsford) to truly turn on them just yet.
cyclists' age-old desire to hitch their systems to an outside motor has created perceptions which are hard to change and the picture of a rider puffing on an inhaler leads to one conclusion: doping. It is a mistaken view, out of touch with the realities of modern sport but, for the armchair enthusiast, nothing good comes from a medicine cabinet."
70kmph said:He looked disturbed and wondering how Froome could get a 2000 reading with the inhaler saying "It looks bad,,,"Walsh appeared via webcam with a nice shot of his enlarged forehead, saying not much other than “this doesn’t look good”.
But the explanation is simple
That retreat is quicker that the Brits from Castlebar in 1798...buckle said: