I Watch Cycling In July said:Get some perspective. In my eyes the guy who was molesting children is way ahead in the biggest scum stakes. Joe isn't even in the running.
The Outside Magazine article paints a picture of quite a conflicted person, still in the grip of the frivolous and rather childish 'bling' values of the cycling world. It is 'disappointing' that he continued to sell after the Landis trial, but not unforgivable IMO. Shaking off the influence of a culture you have been exposed to for years is not necessarily an instantaneous (or painless) process.
Nobody can deny that his confessions have made a contribution to exposing and understanding doping in pro cycling. As such, it is likely that those confessions will contribute to deterring others from going down the same path. Shooting the messenger is counterproductive.
You certainly have me there. I totally agree that molesting children is certainly worse in every way. I should have made it more clear I was refering to doping cases only.
On the other hand, I do not agree with your belief that Joe will deter riders from doping. What will riders think of his statements now? Doping ruined Joes life, yet he continued to deal the drugs? I personally cannot take anyone with that level of hypocrisy seriously.
I don’t understand where all the trust and admiration for Joe comes from on this forum. Just because he talking about how HE doped posters on this forum take his word for gospel, yet when Tom Zirble is candid and forward about his doping case, while proclaiming his innocence, he is thrown under the bus as a liar and cheat. Looks like Joe has been lying, just like every other doper that gets blasted on this forum.