chase196126 said:
Hmm, if Joe was so intent about coming clean about his past I wonder why he never mentioned this "little detail" in his blog or any recent interview.
.
Joe has several times in posts said that he cannot comment further, or cannot say something because of the upcoming court case. I assume some of those refers to things like this.
davidg said:
So is it better to have confessed about your own use, but conveniently omitted to tell about dealing, than to not confess about buying just for yourself.
Carry on.
With an impending court case, i find it likely that you cannot discuss facts related to the case on a public forum.
Im sure the truth will come out in the end, it usually does.. (except in cycling maybe)
As for the news, im completely unsurprised and almost indifferent to it. Where did people think riders got stuff from, your at the top you use it, youre at the bottom you supply it. Joe is just one of many many many.
I think the internet thing is interesting, theres two ways it could be viewed, a website where any old tom d1ck and harry can buy it, or just a way of arranging transactions.. Its much easier to mask transactions, deal with things anonymously using the internet than brown paper bags in dodgy backrooms.. Selling over the internet, and using the internet to sell and distribute are very different..
But anyway, not surprised, for every rider on ped's there has to be someone selling or handling the stuff.. why the shock?