And knowing the mentor of Vandenbrouck supplied him with some forbidden stuff makes even me suspicious.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
unsheath said:And would have won at Luz Ardiden as well if he didnt panic when he saw Schleck. Non winner to cleaning up the biggest stage of the tour so far. Draw your own conclusions.
Libertine Seguros said:Mikel Nieve had never won before Cotobello last year either. But his wins haven't been subjected to this ridicule.
Libertine Seguros said:Mikel Nieve had never won before Cotobello last year either. But his wins haven't been subjected to this ridicule.
El Pistolero said:2011 14 Saint-Gaudens 168.5 HC Jelle Vanendert Thomas Voeckler 46:04
2007 14 Mazamet 170 HC Alberto Contador Michael Rasmussen 44:08
2004 13 Lannemezan 205.5 HC Lance Armstrong Thomas Voeckler 45:30
2002 12 Lannemezan 198 HC Lance Armstrong Lance Armstrong 45:43
1998 11 Bagnères-de-Luchon 170 HC Marco Pantani Jan Ullrich 43:30*
TeamSkyFans said:youve lost me, why does every line have two riders on it?
maltiv said:So who would've thought before the season that Bert de Clerq and Vanendert would end up with MTF victories against the best (not from early breakaways) at the Giro and the TDF respectively? Some performances are just too good to be true.
Or...the peloton is simply a lot cleaner (not necessarily less dopers but definitely less doping) which gives clean riders a chance to shine. Given how much slower everyone are climbing than in previous years, I'll go with the latter.
roundabout said:uh, dichotomy alert.
Lanark said:Personally I think it's a bit of both. On the one hand, the peloton has gotten cleaner. Especially with the ALFD at the head of this year's doping tests, I wouldn't be suprised if the riders are really scared, and take few risks (not completely clean), giving riders who were always quite talented the chance to shine.
On the other hand, because the peloton is cleaner, the people who still hardcore dope (or have some new product) have a much bigger advantage than they had a couple of years ago. This results in a very moderate talent like Vanendert suddenly responding effortlessly to attacks from Andy Schleck. In a 'cleaner' peloton, the efficiency of doping increases.
I really don't feel I contradicted myself. Voeckler has always been consider clean and he definitely didn't come out of nowhere. Yet I can hardly believe him, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. Vanendert is just a bit too much in my opinion.roundabout said:uh, dichotomy alert.
I never said he is a doper no doubt. But I can agree that my arguments are quite weak, I'm just saying how I feel, although it doesn't make a lot of sense...maybe I just want to believe in Voeckler.Parrulo said:a 26 year old who has been having physical problems for the past couple of years finally getting some good performances= doper no doubt
a 32 year old that has always been a good puncher but nowhere near the top level guys in the mountains is all of sudden almost dropping contador and countering all of the schlecks attacks in the mountains= i will give him the benefit of the doubt
sounds logical
btw i am not saying that venenderts performance isn't suspect. it is a suspect performance but imo voecklers is much more.
Mrs John Murphy said:Gilbert's strong performances this spring.
Very strong Giro ride so far, stage win and lots of attacks from different Lotto riders.
Matt Lloyd and JVDB II scoring 8 on the UCI dirty scale.
While not at Cack/Saxo/Astana levels of sustained dirtiness over the years, is it time to start looking at them a little bit more critically?
MarkvW said:Love Phil's new hairstyle. Bet that peroxide REALLY cleans the hair!
maltiv said:So who would've thought before the season that Bert de Clerq and Vanendert would end up with MTF victories against the best (not from early breakaways) at the Giro and the TDF respectively? Some performances are just too good to be true.
Lanark said:I was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt for the longest time, but this was just a joke. I have no doubt VDB would have won this Tour without a crash. It's like Saunier Duval revisited.