Boring, Froome already did that.After he wins the Vuelta, he has to try and win the Giro, right? To hold all three titles at the same time?
Boring, Froome already did that.After he wins the Vuelta, he has to try and win the Giro, right? To hold all three titles at the same time?
sure I understand your post. It's true it's a guess, but it's a good guess nevertheless
Are you upset that he mentions any person or event that he dedicates his winnings to. You must be easily irritated and you obviously must not listen to other interviews when winners dedicate their winnings to any person. Need I remind you about a person called Pogacar and his stage win that he dedicated to his girlfriend who crashedWell, they're of course not funny individually but there certainly seems to be a pattern.
Yesterday it was Nathan's accident
The other day it was his daughter's birthday
In Dauphiné there had been an incident at a kindergarten somewhere in France
Last year on Hautacam, he had apparently promised his girlfriend he'd win
He can win all 3 GTs next year. That would be something new.Boring, Froome already did that.
They aren’tActually I'm less certain he'll win Vuelta after today. Kuss is still hanging on and tomorrow is maybe the last chance (not sure if they will get crazy on Saturday). I think that, after today, they may even stop attacking Kuss (if Vingo's words at the finish are worth anything).
After he wins the Vuelta, he has to try and win the Giro, right? To hold all three titles at the same time?
If Vingegaard is his level of this Vuelta at the Tour, especially the first 11 stages, he gets torched seven way from sunday by Pogacar.I think he does only the Tour next year because of wanting to do both the Olympics and Worlds, meaning his season has to be structured differently.
Provided he wins the Tour next year, I could see him going for the triple in 2025 because that would truly be historic.
- I doubt he can do it but I could see him make the attempt, especially if the 3 routes invite it.
If Vingegaard is his level of this Vuelta at the Tour, especially the first 11 stages, he gets torched seven way from sunday by Pogacar.
Has anyone said Roglic was the bad guy here? Except in jest, mostly to mock the psychotics comming over from the Roglic thread spewing the most heinous insults.Let me get this straight:
- Vingegaard did not really prep for this race, seemingly indicating it doesn’t mean much to him
- Roglic would be matching the Vuelta wind record and was denied his big GT target, the Tour, by the team, whereas JV is secure as the top GC rider in the world with little to gain here as two-time Tour champ
- This could be life changing for Kuss, with a career defining, wealth giving moment at hand
- Roglic was significantly stronger in the ITT and on the first real climb on stage 6
- Kuss was gifted time in a breakaway but has been weaker than team leaders in the ITT and across mountain stages
- Roglic has sat in the bunch marking opponents while both teammates rode up the road, hurting his own GC chances, on multiple occasions
- Vingegaard has snapped to his teammates ever single time, refusing to sacrifice for his teammates
- Yesterday, the team agreed to ride for Roglic, but instead Vingegaard audibled and rode for the win, not only taking the stage but also passing Roglic in GC
- Today, Roglic rode for the win with little hope of catching either of his teammates in GC, but instead of Vinge acting like Roglic the day before and sitting on, he chased down Roglic and put significant time on Kuss
- Roglic is the bad guy?
I see him not being stranger than Jonas, after the tour, with bad prep and diarrhea the first week.
Think they are about equalI'm not sure which of the two I'd consider strangest.![]()
Think they are about equal![]()
Yeah, that's why I like Kuss the best. He seems so nice and normal.They're pro cyclists, so they're obviously both a bit strange.
Yeah, that's why I like Kuss the best. He seems so nice and normal.
The bias here is thick and smelly.Has anyone said Roglic was the bad guy here? Except in jest, mostly to mock the psychotics comming over from the Roglic thread spewing the most heinous insults.
I like Roglic just fine and feel like I try to look at it for a cycling appreciation standpoint. It is obvious you see things differently if you are a fan, we interpret the little signs the riders give to fit our own narrative.
I my opinion this Vuelta has been both a success and a failure for Roglic. He has cemented his position as the 3 best GC riders in the world. But he failed in showing the team he is able to compete for real tour leadership.
You see a Roglic being strong and being held back by tactics and the team. I see him not being stranger than Jonas, after the tour, with bad prep and diarrhea the first week. He said he was bad even on tourmalet still.
If you bring Jonas you have to expect him to do Jonas things and that is attacking from a distance, if he can't do that, then don't bring him. This clashes with Roglic and his little bonus second dance.
That may be the case. It's often hard to see you own bias. We all think we are mister objective.The bias here is thick and smelly.