Moose McKnuckles said:Read the OP again, because you don't even have that right. The OP was a LINK.
I meant poursuivants, the poster Hitch quoted, not the thread starter
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Moose McKnuckles said:Read the OP again, because you don't even have that right. The OP was a LINK.
Zam_Olyas said:Jimmy, your are slipping ..nervous at the clinic after being back from a holiday?
JimmyFingers said:I meant poursuivants, the poster Hitch quoted, not the thread starter
thehog said:Good to have your ineptness back Jimmy. A welcome return.
JimmyFingers said:And I look forward to ignoring your lame insults
He did Ax-3 faster than Armstrong ever did after PailhèresJimmyFingers said:When did he do that? And from official timing or someone watching the highlights show with a stop watch?
JimmyFingers said:I had a brilliant holiday thanks, bikebacking around Acquitane, riding in the mornings, watching and enjoying the Tour in the afternoon. Felt guilty treating my Guerciotti like a pack animal but managed 500k plus in about 8 days, which given the weight I was pushing and the hot July conditions.
But of course you weren't asking about that were you
Netserk said:He did Ax-3 faster than Armstrong ever did after Pailhères
Netserk said:He did Ax-3 faster than Armstrong ever did after Pailhères
JimmyFingers said:when Kimmage is coherent he is genius, and charismatic with it, when he starts to insult and abuse that is shattered. Those that might laud him turn away instead. Shame
Benotti69 said:This Jimmy did you not read this^^^^^^
Plenty of people were angered by this. Brailsford predicted it the day before with a "it is possible for 'clean' riders to beat doped performances" then Froome goes full genius on Ax-3.
Kimmage aint perfect and i bet he'd be the first to admit to it. But i think he'll be proven right about Sky. When? F**k knows, but we always find out who doped, always.
Netserk said:He did Ax-3 faster than Armstrong ever did after Pailhères
Benotti69 said:This Jimmy did you not read this^^^^^^
Plenty of people were angered by this. Brailsford predicted it the day before with a "it is possible for 'clean' riders to beat doped performances" then Froome goes full genius on Ax-3.
Kimmage aint perfect and i bet he'd be the first to admit to it. But i think he'll be proven right about Sky. When? F**k knows, but we always find out who doped, always.
JimmyFingers said:Didn't Netserk write that in response to me?
To the second you are right we'll find out in time. As for Kimmage he needs to calm down, presenting yourself coherently and rationally will get you listened to, rant and abuse people on Twitter and you don't. For sure he has valid points to make them, but he risks drowning that out with his vitriol and snark. As Moore said, how to destroy a reputation in 800+ tweets.
JimmyFingers said:That is as maybe, but it won't help him being listened to
The team brought journalist David Walsh into the frame at the start of the year and the author of Seven Deadly Sins was embedded with the team all the way to Paris. He concluded that he believed that the team were riding clean, and interviewed Porte towards the end of the race.
“I just started reading his book. I didn’t know he was so hard core to be honest. As a gift he also gave me Rough Ride. I’m nearly on to that now,” he said.
JimmyFingers said:when Kimmage is coherent he is genius, and charismatic with it, when he starts to insult and abuse that is shattered. Those that might laud him turn away instead. Shame
No we don't always find out who doped. You keep saying it because you wish it was true. You've always lost however whenever you tried to pass off this lie.Benotti69 said:This Jimmy did you not read this^^^^^^
Plenty of people were angered by this. Brailsford predicted it the day before with a "it is possible for 'clean' riders to beat doped performances" then Froome goes full genius on Ax-3.
Kimmage aint perfect and i bet he'd be the first to admit to it. But i think he'll be proven right about Sky. When? F**k knows, but we always find out who doped, always.
Benotti69 said:Richard Moore has no reputible reputation in cycling, he is another hack who follows omerta.
I dont see Kimmage ranting, i see him calling spades, spades.
The Hitch said:No we don't always find out who doped. You keep saying it because you wish it was true. You've always lost however whenever you tried to pass off this lie.
Benotti69 said:We didn't find out since 1991 till 2007 that all the TdF winners were dopers?
Dr. Maserati said:Boohoo.
Kimmage has been the exact same since he wrote Rough Ride, the only people 'turning away' are Sky fans.
TourOfSardinia said:CarlosSastre
JimmyFingers said:Doesn't change the fact he is an increasingly poor anti-doping spokesman, and not only Sky fans
See, I can make generalisations as well