- Jan 10, 2010
- 1,717
- 1
- 10,485
- Jan 10, 2010
- 1,717
- 1
- 10,485
- Feb 23, 2014
- 8,827
- 254
- 17,880
Re:
I've heard this a million times...don't people get it?...the gay person and a group of people (church) comparison doesn't add up. It would be more like a heterosexual couple getting tax benefits and a gay couple not. A group of gay people could start a church and still have tax benefits.
JackRabbitSlims said:
I've heard this a million times...don't people get it?...the gay person and a group of people (church) comparison doesn't add up. It would be more like a heterosexual couple getting tax benefits and a gay couple not. A group of gay people could start a church and still have tax benefits.
Re: Re:
Fair enough, but I personally think that churches should pay tax, but maybe slightly lower than a corporation.Jspear said:JackRabbitSlims said:
I've heard this a million times...don't people get it?...the gay person and a group of people (church) comparison doesn't add up. It would be more like a heterosexual couple getting tax benefits and a gay couple not. A group of gay people could start a church and still have tax benefits.
- Apr 12, 2009
- 2,364
- 0
- 0
Re: Re:
2) It does add op somehow, depends on how you read it. He does not compare gay people with religions, but gay vs straight with religious organisations vs non-religious organisations. And remarks that in both cases the one has other rights/obligations than the other.
Some groups are just not religious, it's not their fault, they are born that way. You should't force them to become churches just in order to avoid taxes!
1) It's a joke, made by a comedianJspear said:I've heard this a million times...don't people get it?...the gay person and a group of people (church) comparison doesn't add up. It would be more like a heterosexual couple getting tax benefits and a gay couple not. A group of gay people could start a church and still have tax benefits.
2) It does add op somehow, depends on how you read it. He does not compare gay people with religions, but gay vs straight with religious organisations vs non-religious organisations. And remarks that in both cases the one has other rights/obligations than the other.
Some groups are just not religious, it's not their fault, they are born that way. You should't force them to become churches just in order to avoid taxes!
- Jan 10, 2010
- 1,717
- 1
- 10,485
Re: Re:
Ricky having a chat about the Bible - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oH0ReL3Cew
Buffalo Soldier said:1) It's a joke, made by a comedianJspear said:I've heard this a million times...don't people get it?...the gay person and a group of people (church) comparison doesn't add up. It would be more like a heterosexual couple getting tax benefits and a gay couple not. A group of gay people could start a church and still have tax benefits.
2) It does add op somehow, depends on how you read it. He does not compare gay people with religions, but gay vs straight with religious organisations vs non-religious organisations. And remarks that in both cases the one has other rights/obligations than the other.
Some groups are just not religious, it's not their fault, they are born that way. You should't force them to become churches just in order to avoid taxes!
Ricky having a chat about the Bible - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3oH0ReL3Cew
TRENDING THREADS
-
Teams & Riders The Remco Evenepoel is the next Eddy Merckx thread- Started by DNP-Old
- Replies: 36K
-
Teams & Riders Tadej Pogačar discussion thread- Started by Lequack
- Replies: 41K
-
Teams & Riders The Great Big Cycling Transfers, Extensions, and Rumours Thread- Started by RedheadDane
- Replies: 13K
-
Teams & Riders Best riders never to win a monument
- Started by hayneplane
- Replies: 20
-
Il Lombardia 2025, monument, October 11- Started by Krzysztof_O
- Replies: 792
-
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram