La Flèche Wallonne 2023, one day classic, April 19 (men's)

Page 10 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Skjelmose quite impressive. I figured top 5 would be logical in this field, but he actually finishes quite close to Pogacar.
I guess Pidcock really isn't in top shape, and this sort of climb isn't Healy's cup of tea either.
A top 10 for Van Wilder would have been nice, but he got overrun a bit.

PS: Hermans also quite underwhelming. Higuita nowhere in sight.
 
Last edited:
This edition once again made me wonder how differently this race would be ridden if it didn't come 4 days before LBL. A guy like Landa clearly cared about this race, but he still chose a strategy he always knew would get him 2nd at best, because his real goal comes on sunday. And that's really what everyone except UAE did.
Didn’t seem to make a difference for Valverde . . .
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHAD0W93
I guess Pidcock really isn't in top shape, and this sort of climb isn't Healy's cup of tea either.
Re Healy: could be but he started Huy way back so I'm not sure whether we can assess his performance.
Navigating through the bunch doesn't look like his forte. He was very close to the front at the top of Cherave, then kept losing positions in the descent / flat section.
Perhaps that's why he's always on the attack.
 
Why do you write something like this? I now rewatched because I thought there was something I didn't see. There was barely one metre of road up the Mur where Pidcock didn't have free space in front of him and/or to the left of him. He clearly did not get squeezed but just didn't have the legs...
Tbh I only saw Pidcock getting squeezed, not the results that he finished like 20th
 
Re Healy: could be but he started Huy way back so I'm not sure whether we can assess his performance.
Navigating through the bunch doesn't look like his forte. He was very close to the front at the top of Cherave, then kept losing positions in the descent / flat section.
Perhaps that's why he's always on the attack.
Nah I just think Healy is the type of rider that doesn't have the best pure W/kg on a single hill and he just needs a hard, race where flats also matter and where recovery and fatigue resistance is also important.
 
This was the most predictable classic of the spring, but another nice win for Pogacar. He didn't give a huge demonstration today, but did just enough to win. His team did the hard work, and he finished it with one acceleration on the last steep part. With three classics and two stage races under his belt -12 wins in total - he's having an exceptional spring campaign. He's the man of the spring already and there's another chance on Sunday.
 
Ignoring Pog the days of the Ardennes triple might be over. Healy and Pidcock were nowhere to be found today. Pidcock himself mentioned that he went too deep in Amstel and didn´t have the legs on the Mur.
So ignoring the guy who might achieve the first Ardennes triple in over ten years, the days of the Ardennes triple might be over?
 
So ignoring the guy who might achieve the first Ardennes triple in over ten years, the days of the Ardennes triple might be over?

Was thinking about the startlist and the amount of riders that are competitive in all three races. Feels like in the 00s it was a given that the best hilly classic riders would start in all three races. Try to compete in all three races. Ignoring the biggest anomaly in pro cycling I am not sure if that is still the case. Feels like the amount of guys that skipped Amstel and/or Fleche is higher than ever.
 
Last edited:
Re Healy: could be but he started Huy way back so I'm not sure whether we can assess his performance.
Navigating through the bunch doesn't look like his forte. He was very close to the front at the top of Cherave, then kept losing positions in the descent / flat section.
Perhaps that's why he's always on the attack.
I recall Healy was in a break with Eenkhorn on the first Mallorca Trophy this year. He looked a bit lacking in descending skills.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Was thinking about the startlist and the amount of riders that are competitive in all three races. Feels like in the 00s it was a given that the best hilly classic riders would start in all three races. Try to compete in all three races. Ignoring the biggest anomaly in pro cycling I ma not sure if that is still the case. Feels like the amount of guys that skipped Amstel and/or Fleche is higher than ever.


Wasn't it because back in 2000's you just had more clear-cut hilly clasics riders? Unlike today, when most of the favorites for LBL are mainly GT riders.
Besides, the classic Cauberg finish used to suit the punchers a lot more than the current route IMO.
 

Latest posts