In difficult or attritional conditions like today it's more useful to look at the differential to the other competitors rather than time or w/kg.
I think the key for Pogacar was drinking the beer on Sunday.
Skjelmose and Remco didn't drink and look where they finished today. Pogacar drank it and wins.
Riders should remember that
I think the key for Pogacar was drinking the beer on Sunday.
Skjelmose and Remco didn't drink and look where they finished today. Pogacar drank it and wins.
Riders should remember that
I don't know. His knee was a bit uglySkjelmose didn't even do that...
Yes. I'm bitter because that means loosing 5 points for the CQ game.
At least he should be okay for Sunday.
I don't know. His knee was a bit ugly
My main theory: You win some, you lose some. It works. 😆Please tell us your theory. Pogacar who has successfully done many more and longer solos than the one at Amstel, decides to get caught and lose the sprint because he didn't like winning?
No, sorry. You win some you lose some in a sprint, that's possible. A sprint is about timing, positioning, wind direction, lead out etc. A 50km solo is nothing like that. So when a guy who does ten 50km solos per year and wins 10 per year, to suddenly get caught 10km from the line, then you need to come up with something better.My main theory: You win some, you lose some. It works. 😆
Pogacar who went solo and ended second, did really well that day. Evenepoel beat Van Aert in a sprint the other day, then lost a sprint at Amstel. *** happens. These tiny differences in the results from one race to another are not worth analyzing deeply.
But it happens every year - people think they see weaknesses in Pogacar. And yet he has four times as many UCI points as the next best.
I guess it's wishful thinking. People want today's cycling to be normal. But it isn't.
And he lost by 8 inchesMy main theory: You win some, you lose some. It works. 😆
Pogacar who went solo and ended second, did really well that day. Evenepoel beat Van Aert in a sprint the other day, then lost a sprint at Amstel. *** happens. These tiny differences in the results from one race to another are not worth analyzing deeply.
But it happens every year - people think they see weaknesses in Pogacar. And yet he has four times as many UCI points as the next best.
I guess it's wishful thinking. People want today's cycling to be normal. But it isn't.
Sometimes you have a day below optimal shape, it‘s how humans workNo, sorry. You win some you lose some in a sprint, that's possible. A sprint is about timing, positioning, wind direction, lead out etc. A 50km solo is nothing like that. So when a guy who does ten 50km solos per year and wins 10 per year, to suddenly get caught 10km from the line, then you need to come up with something better.
Wow, you sound bitter, but hard to tell who it’s directed at? You realize the entire forum doesn’t think the same way?This was both comical and tragic. 😆
- All those who had seen a worn Pogacar in Amstel... what is their theory now? When will people learn that a second place in a big race is not a significant sign of weakness?
- Fleche-Wallone has been among the most boring one-day classics for some years now. Only the steep climb at the end has fascinated. Today, this single remaining strength of the race was totally ridiculed.
If you want Pogacar to dominate cycling, it would be absurd if you agreed with me.Wow, you sound bitter, but hard to tell who it’s directed at? You realize the entire forum doesn’t think the same way?
Fair point on Vauquelin. He rode superbly. In Nys' defense, I think a lot of people including Skeljmose tabbed him as a (potential) favorite in this race. I think he rode very well, particularly after suffering in the cold. But he didn't have that explosiveness today that many were expecting, I agree with you there.His overrated-ness is proportional to the hype and his 'rating'. It's not about Nys per se. But the conversation around him. Eurosport commentators talking about him as a favorite today. Stuff like that.
How about no? Kévin Vauquelin hardly ever gets mentioned, for example. Similar age as well and he had more credentials in Flèche.
That's basic underrated versus overrated.
Chapeau mate. Wonderful post! The hype in Belgium was enormous around Nys. I also thought he could be Pogacar's best opponent but never thought he could beat Pogacar like some guys were pretending.His overrated-ness is proportional to the hype and his 'rating'. It's not about Nys per se. But the conversation around him. Eurosport commentators talking about him as a favorite today. Stuff like that.
How about no? Kévin Vauquelin hardly ever gets mentioned, for example. Similar age as well and he had more credentials in Flèche.
That's basic underrated versus overrated.
100% agree. This doesn't seem like it should be that hard...Sometimes you have a day below optimal shape, it‘s how humans work
So you were overrating him as well. It's funny because in Belgium there was no consensus that Nys was going to beat Pogacar... like you are pretending. I for one have said from the start Huy is too long (at that slope) for him currently.Chapeau mate. Wonderful post! The hype in Belgium was enormous around Nys. I also thought he could be Pogacar's best opponent but never thought he could beat Pogacar like some guys were pretending.
Actually I never thought someone would really be dangerous to Pogacar BUT if I had to choose, I would choose Nys.So you were overrating him as well. It's funny because in Belgium there was no consensus that Nys was going to beat Pogacar... like you are pretending. I for one have said from the start Huy is too long (at that slope) for him currently.