just brain storming the political experience angle of the new guy and his connectedness to the big wigs network…
may be one of the new tactics will be gradual ratcheting up pressure on the prosecution via mobilizing ‘friendly’ media ?
let’s face it, having nyt and wsj leading a cause against their client can’t be beneficial to his image. it’s also pretty clear texas is losing on the internet (just check the stoned quality).
but there’s still a lot of ‘uncommitted’ press. particularly on the american west coast.
to balance them out, this new guy can prepare and feed his old media buddies some stories (like pat jonker’s) based on friendly recollections of former associates, postal riders, retired politicians, medical and physiology gurus.
the themes to explore are endless, one only needs to place a call and throw enough money in:
‘un-mmerican witch hunt, taxpayers money, anticancer heroics, landis lacks credibility, never tested positive, true american hero, lance is miracle of nature, lemond is a jealous buffoon'….you name it…
edit: just noted that thehog addressed some of my points already.