All charities that I know of calculate their overhead as being their own cost of running the operation. And the rest is donated to the intented cause. And LAF? The 81% includes items such as:
- salaries and wages
- travel
- advertising
- payroll taxes
- bank service fees
- retirement plan contributions
- professional fundraising fees
Check yourself. Page 27/33 of
http://www.livestrong.org/pdfs/4-0/2008-2009combinedauditreport. You get the 81% via diving "Program expenses" by "Total" - $28,833,066 / $35,284,215.
Their own web site info about "Where the money goes" tries to pitch this way of accounting as the charity-standard - 81% is actually good and looks great on a chart like this (the numbers aren't an exact match with the audit report, but close):
http://www.livestrong.org/What-We-Do/Our-Approach/Where-the-Money-Goes
As for their mission, it's hard to find that written anywhere on their web site. Rather than speak for the LAF, I've picked a few of their noted accomplishments in their own words from here
http://www.livestrong.org/Who-We-Are/Our-History/Milestones:
- 2005: The LAF sells more than 55 million wristbands.
- 2005: The LAF awards $500,000 to assist survivors affected by Hurricane Katrina.
- 2005: Lance wins the Tour de France a record-breaking seventh time in a row.
- 2006: The LAF hosts the inaugural LIVESTRONG Summit.
- 2007: Distributes more than 34,500 LIVESTRONG Survivorship Notebooks to cancer survivors.
- 2008: Lance announces his return to professional cycling.
- 2009: Lance rides in the Tour of California, Tour Down Under, Milan-San Remo, Giro d'Italia, and other races, including the Tour de France, where he places third.
Sounds like a lot of "Lance Armstrong awareness" to me...