Parrulo said:
indeed. VSM deserves this tour spot. he is great on the flat decent on the time trial and not that bad of a climber. he is the domestique every1 would love to have. and he won roubaix which was garmin's biggest win like ever?
Their biggest win by miles. After that you are talking about which of the Tour of Poland, a Giro stage, Tre Valli or whatever is in second. They rack up a large number of small or medium size wins, but they have nothing even close to Roubaix.
On the face of it, Martin being left out is easier to explain. Garmin are going to be badly stretched to chase three distinct goals in the Tour, a GC top 10, sprint stages and the TTT. Martin could reasonably be seen as a luxury in those circumstances. He's not going to be of much assistance in the TTT or in working for the sprinters. He hasn't yet shown that he can be consistent in a three week race, so he might have a few off days and not be able to work for their GC men in the mountains as well as someone who has shown the ability to ride a full GT well. They weren't going to rest their GC hopes on him for the same reason. They'd essentially be bringing him along to stage hunt. He'd be a big asset to most teams, but most teams haven't already split their priorities so many ways.
Vansummeren, on the other hand, is as useful an all round domestique as you could wish for. Navardauskas is there to do the same job. He's a promising young talent, and he just won his national road race and came second in the TT so he's in form, but they can hardly be as sure that he's capable of doing endless donkey work for three weeks as they are of Vansummeren. I think that the people suggesting above that there must be a form issue are probably right.