The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
SpartacusRox said:I read it. Pretty boring really though I did get through to page 25,000.
I don't like Lance
I don't like Lance
I don't Like Lance
I don't like Lance
x 70,000...gets a bit repetitive after a while.
Squares said:You apparently missed the page that said:
That damn Lance beat my record, he must have doped, no American could beat my record without doping. In fact, no American but me is good enough to win the Tour. Everyone is a doper but me.
SpartacusRox said:I read it. Pretty boring really though I did get through to page 25,000.
I don't like Lance
I don't like Lance
I don't Like Lance
I don't like Lance
x 70,000...gets a bit repetitive after a while.
it's less boring than your constant whining about a group of posters here.SpartacusRox said:I read it. Pretty boring really though I did get through to page 25,000.
I don't like Lance
I don't like Lance
I don't Like Lance
I don't like Lance
x 70,000...gets a bit repetitive after a while.
python said:it's less boring than your constant whining about a group of posters here.
callac said:Isn't just 70,000 an expression to mean an a$$load of pages?
(native english speakers may help here... )
theswordsman said:It would have been a matter of boxing them up, I imagine. It's not like he's been surfing the web and printing things up.
blutto said:...kettle,meet pot...pot,meet kettle...
....but what is really funny is that for all intents and purposes Greg and Lance are simply two sides of a very thin dime...though to Lance's credit he did start with nothing and made something of himself ( though admittedly playing by the rules of the way the game was in actuality played...which are/were pretty well agreed upon quite rotten...)...
Cheers
blutto
theswordsman said:The 70,000 pages are from the lawsuit against Trek, where they didn't promote his bike line as planned because he accused Lance of doping. He won. It's not as simple as that, but I imagine those include all the financial documents and discovery, testimony and everything else remotely related to the case.
It would have been a matter of boxing them up, I imagine. It's not like he's been surfing the web and printing things up.
thatsallfolks said:
callac said:Isn't just 70,000 an expression to mean an a$$load of pages?
(native english speakers may help here... )
callac said:Indeed, the joint press release by LeMond and Trek makes it sound like everybody's happy with the result...
Joint Press Release of Greg LeMond and Trek Bicycle Corporation
February 2, 2010
Cycling legend Greg LeMond and Trek Bicycle Corporation announced an agreement to close out all remaining issues for the business venture they began in 1995, and to provide funding for a charity near Greg's heart.
"Greg has a hard-won place in the Pantheon of bicycle racing, and we are proud of what we were able to accomplish together," said Trek's President John Burke. "Trek respects Greg’s efforts and commitment to the charitable foundation, 1in6.org, and Trek is pleased to lend its support to that very worthwhile endeavor."
Three-time Tour de France winner LeMond said: "I am pleased to resolve the issues between Trek and myself and am happy to be able to move forward with the things important in my life. I appreciate Trek’s support for the work of 1in6.org. I take deep satisfaction in this resolution and believe it will have a positive impact on those that can benefit most from the purpose of 1in6.org."
QuickStepper said:That link makes it pretty hard to find the press release. Here's the actual text:
Yup. Sounds like nobody "won" and they agreed to simply stop the lawsuit in exchange for Trek making a contribution to the 1in6.org foundation.
BikeCentric said:Public Strategies working overtime on the PR "war" in this thread.
I also can't figure out why these muppets would bother to come to a discussion board like this in an attempt to change anyone's opinion.