- Sep 25, 2009
BikeCentric said:The two cases regarded very different contracts so just comparing Dollar amounts from settlement is a red herring. <snip>.
guys i appreciate your efforts at details but the issue here was not the analytical-legal comparison of the merits and the details of lemond's settlement with trek vs. armstrong's settlement with sca (it was the usual, expected bait, red herring from a proven experienced troll chrisE) but whether the lemond vs. trek settlement was a 'win' compared to texas apologists calling his settlement with sca a 'win'.MacRoadie said:Ok, I'll bite. The SCA "award" was <snip>
quickstepper expanded great deal of energy refuting the swordsman’s term ‘lemond’s win’ was really a settlement. then, i came along and said some legal outcomes termed by texas as his 'wins' were actually legal settlement if one strictly followed the logic set out by quickstepper regarding gerg’s case against trek. i challenged those uttering the settlement word now to 'engaging their brain' as demanded by chrisE regarding the past cases. then the known trolll chrisE challenges everyone to compare the merits and detail of the two cases ('as proposed by python'), which even to an uneducated folk is an obvious red herring given the well known confidentiality still surrounding lemond’s vs trek settlement.
once again we have a known troll with multiple sock puppets able to sidetrack a thread supposedly because his landsman and idol is in trouble.