- Apr 30, 2011
- 49,281
- 31,927
- 28,180
the standard approach used every single year since 2018Which standard?
see eg the official video of the 2019 route
Last edited:
the standard approach used every single year since 2018Which standard?
But he is the Messiah!! Forget about this 'turning water into wine' business, Messiah Paul can turn fatigue into watts!!Motivation doesn't give you extra watts if you're cooked. We shall see on Sunday if he struggles in the final or not
Rather than a three-way fight, it suggests a hierarchy. Pogacar at the top, Seixas emerging as the closest challenger, and Evenepoel needing to prove he can match that level when it matters most.
I wonder why we can't see it in the actual climb times? Maybe they were better on the steeper sections and Remco on the less steep sections. Also, it's difficult to make a qualitative assessment. Pogacar never looks as if he puts any effort in and MVDP is a master on that terrain and heavier so he 'dances' less on the cobbles. https://watts2win.eu/nl/result/20260014000/watts?s=5I've spoken with people who were at Kwaremont, and they all agree that the difference between Pogacar and Remco was noticeable. Pogacar was far superior to Remco there; it's not just about seconds . Those who saw them climb that section say so. And if you watch at YouTube videos that people have uploaded, you can see it, although it's even more apparent in person.
That said, every race is different. This is another race, and the form is different. Flanders is another race with different protagonists: VDP, Van Aert, Pedersen... and Pogacar there, for now, is more superior to Remco than some people think.
They also tell that Van der Poel's climb at Kwaremont conveyed a force that Remco didn't. VDP wouldn't have a chance to win Liège.
Forget Flanders. It's a different race.
Remco lost significant time when Pogacar forced the pace.I wonder why we can't see it in the actual climb times? Maybe they were better on the steeper sections and Remco on the less steep sections. Also, it's difficult to make a qualitative assessment. Pogacar never looks as if he puts any effort in and MVDP is a master on that terrain and heavier so he 'dances' less on the cobbles. https://watts2win.eu/nl/result/20260014000/watts?s=5
Stopped reading early as I saw the banner something like 'power levels are already higher than Vingegaars'...eh? Vingegaard does not ride one day races like at all. Week long or so analytics, it's normal that young gifted athletes are very powerful and sharp and later will loose that a bit as they build that one-two-three gt's per year endurance. Dunno if Seixas has already higher blaa blaa blaa becase he hasn't done a gt.A fair comment on the pre-race hoopla -
https://cyclinguptodate.com/cycling...year-old-as-tadej-pogacars-closest-challenger
Just read his interview in CN. Giving view how Seixas maybe does not have endurance for the endgame. This moody af being expert when his performance is always, always, 50/50. It maybe something spectacular or it's shouting and banging his bike at the side of a road.RBH team for tomorrow. Should be good enough to help Evenepoel sit in the wheel of Pogacar, and see where it takes him. Maybe Hindley can show his form for the Giro too
View: https://x.com/RBH_ProCycling/status/2047939682684588177
He might have a point, it's hard to know. I think the only five or six hour races Seixas has done have been Rwanda and Il Lombardia, and he did find then noticeably harder than the 200km European Champs in the middle.Just read his interview in CN. Giving view how Seixas maybe does not have endurance for the endgame. This moody af being expert when his performance is always, always, 50/50. It maybe something spectacular or it's shouting and banging his bike at the side of a road.
I'm a bit surprised I must say.the standard approach used every single year since 2018
see eg the official video of the 2019 route
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO6jXmxo9VQ
![]()
tissot that i linked to also has the official gpx route since 2022 , you just have to toggle the yearI'm a bit surprised I must say.
Looking at Cyclingstage's route for the 2025 edition it clearly states the aporoach from the front side of Hony, i.e. ahead after river bridge, under the railway station and up the residental area before the right turn heading to the steep part.
My time ran out, but thanks for animating me to rewatch all versions of the climb over the years this night![]()
They are clearing the path!There can only be one (French messiah).
I'm not saying you're wrong, but a nice excuse for me to rewatch all the ascents over the years tonighttissot that i linked to also has the official gpx route since 2022 , you just have to toggle the year
![]()
Official Website | Tissot Timing
Discover and follow all the results of the most important cycling competitions on the official Tissot Timing website.www.tissottiming.com
cyclingstage just simply had it wrong , which is why its better to rely on race footage , official route presentation and files etc
What is the source of your data?Remco lost significant time when Pogacar forced the pace.
Koppenberg: 13"
Mariaborrestraat: 5"
Taainenberg (it was MVP who put the tempo): 5"
Kruisberg: 7"
Oude Kwaremont: 31"
Paterberg: 4"
He lost time everywhere, steep sections, shallow sections. Where he didn't lose time and sometimes he gained time were the sections between climbs, specially after Kruisberg.
and even the gpx file there has it right :I'm not saying you're wrong, but a nice excuse for me to rewatch all the ascents over the years tonight![]()
What is the source of your data?
I give inand even the gpx file there has it right :
i have no idea how you got the impression that they didnt take the standard approach last year
I wouldn't factor cobbled/gravel climbs into it, as they tend to favour bigger/heavier riders.Not hard to handtime when you have the race available on youtube.
The link you also put has some climbing times (e.g. Koppenberg was only raced one time so it's easy to see the difference)
View: https://www.youtube.com/live/XMglWo3D1eE?is=cJ8eVeUMniKpmeKw
Edit: 30" in Kwaremont and not 31"
Nothing he said was controversial unless people want to make it thatJust read his interview in CN. Giving view how Seixas maybe does not have endurance for the endgame. This moody af being expert when his performance is always, always, 50/50. It maybe something spectacular or it's shouting and banging his bike at the side of a road.
Yes. Cosnefroy 😂There can only be one (French messiah).
