full text article
Susan, forgive me if this is not cool, thought some were still having trouble with the links...
Livestrong Lobbyist's Agenda Is Questioned
By REED ALBERGOTTI And VANESSA O'CONNELL
The Lance Armstrong Foundation, the Texas-based charity known as Livestrong, sent a lobbyist to Capitol Hill last week to discuss the funding for the agency that has accused the retired cycling champion of cheating to win the Tour de France, a Congressional staff member said.
A spokesman for U.S. Rep. José Serrano (D., N.Y.), who sits on the House Appropriations Committee, said his office was visited by a registered lobbyist working on behalf of the foundation, which works to increase awareness of cancer.
The lobbyist's main purpose, the spokesman said, was to talk about the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, which enforces rules about performance-enhancing drugs in sports, and which has charged Mr. Armstrong and five others associated with his former cycling team with operating a doping conspiracy in an effort to dominate the Tour de France.
Mr. Armstrong, the chairman of Livestrong, has denied ever using performance-enhancing drugs or methods. He has called USADA's charges part of a witch hunt.
Mr. Serrano's spokesman said the Livestrong lobbyist laid out his concerns about the fairness of USADA's process. Two-thirds of USADA's $15 million annual budget comes from taxpayer funds. Neither Mr. Serrano's spokesman nor the Lance Armstrong Foundation would identify the lobbyist.
USADA receives about $10 million a year in the form of a grant from the Office of National Drug Control Policy. Ultimately appropriations committees in the House and U.S. Senate control the ONDCP's budget.
A spokeswoman for the Lance Armstrong Foundation called the description of the lobbyist's visit "inaccurate," and said the charity was active on Capitol Hill last week. The purpose of the visit, she said, may have been misconstrued by Mr. Serrano's office, because the topic of USADA may have come up in passing. "All of our lobbying is focused on the well being and access to care that our constituents rely on," she said.
A spokesman for Mr. Armstrong declined to comment.
Livestrong's goal is helping cancer survivors by increasing awareness of the disease. Mr. Armstrong was diagnosed with testicular cancer in 1996 and recovered to win a record seven consecutive Tours de France from 1999 to 2005. He took up triathlons after retiring from cycling.
The foundation hasn't been accused of any wrongdoing in its lobbying. Livestrong could face challenges if the face of its organization, Mr. Armstrong, is banned from competing in elite-level sports.
In two separate statements last month, the foundation's president, Doug Ulman, lashed out against USADA. "We struggle to understand the leadership choices and lack of openness" of USADA, he said in both statements, questioning its integrity and oversight. "Our hearts go out Lance and his family as they face what can only be a very frustrating and difficult time," he said.
The foundation formed a partnership with the World Triathlon Corporation's Ironman triathlon series that would raise more than $1 million for the foundation, according to a lawsuit Mr. Armstrong filed against USADA earlier this month. Mr. Armstrong also stood to personally benefit from that contract. However, after USADA announced its doping charges against Mr. Armstrong, the WTC suspended him indefinitely from competing in its events.
Arthur Rieman, an attorney who advises nonprofit organizations, said nonprofits generally aren't supposed to use their funds to benefit their board members. However, he said Livestrong could legitimately argue that protecting Mr. Armstrong's reputation ultimately benefits their mission. Such a decision, though, should be run by the board, he said. "If they were my client I would have advised them to do some homework to be able to demonstrate to any third party that supporting Mr. Armstrong's reputation serves the interests of Livestrong," he said.
The Livestrong spokeswoman said "the executive committee of the foundation's board of directors is aware of and fully supports all of the foundation's advocacy efforts.
The organization's annual net revenue and net assets released from restrictions were $48.6 million in 2011, down 2.7% from the preceding year, according to its financial statements.
"For the last two years, we've focused on the mission that Lance laid out for us," a spokeswoman for the foundation said. "That's serving cancer survivors," she said, adding that Mr. Armstrong's effectiveness would remain even if he is stripped of his titles.
Last week, two high-profile Washington politicians weighed in on USADA's charges. On Thursday, Wisconsin Republican Jim Sensenbrenner sent a letter to the Office of National Drug Control Policy, calling USADA's authority over Mr. Armstrong "strained at best." He said it was the International Cycling Union, not USADA, that had jurisdiction over Mr. Armstrong, and pointed to USADA's eight-year statute of limitations. The arguments were identical to the ones made by attorneys for Lance Armstrong in recent weeks.
A spokeswoman for Mr. Sensenbrenner said nobody from his office had any contact with any individuals associated with Mr. Armstrong in the weeks leading up to his letter.
On Friday, Senator John McCain, (R., Ariz.) issued a statement pledging support for USADA. "This process is the proper forum to decide matters concerning individual cases of alleged doping violations," he said. End.