The problem isn't that the LAF is lobbying in support of its founder, as legally, a foundation has legs that are "independent" of its founder. IE, the organization is quite literally dependent on the reputation OF its founder for survival.
There are two problems:
1) That we allow people to set up non-profit, tax-exempt corporations and then use them as tax shelters for themselves, and
2) That we give corporations (profit or non) the same rights as people when it comes to access to the legal system. Corporations should not be allowed to lobby congress, as they're essentially "The Borg". The collective financial resources of thousands (sometimes millions) of people. The Borg can crush individual voters, but individual voters can't even make a dent in The Borg.
Our issue here is really the former. The LAF is not the LAF, but Lance himself. Everyone employed at the LAF works for Lance, and they damn well know it.
Hopefully Lance's narcissism here will draw some much-needed legislative attention to the greater problem of how people use these non-profits as their private tax-free piggy banks. I'm glad that the representative from NY had the huevos to divulge this visit.