- Apr 3, 2009
- 12,585
- 8,436
- 28,180
Jagers said:"Some friendly advice for the greatest cyclist in the history of the world".
I'm surprised an article about Merckx would appear in this magazine.
Jagers said:"Some friendly advice for the greatest cyclist in the history of the world".
flicker said:Micheal Hall and the haters on this forum are quite clueless about pro-cycling.
He is right and wrong in the article. The bottom line is life and procycling are not fair. Hard to say and hard to accept but true irregardless.
To me the firemen who dashed into the flaming world trade center to rescue the victims of 911 are heroes. Pro cyclists and pro athletes are comic book heroes doped to the gills or clean and sober.
Time for the fan-boys and drug crusaders to get a job and a life. Mike Hall is a crybaby. Real heroes are doctors, firemen and cops and soldiers those who save lives. + school teachers who inspire children to greater heigths
hrotha said:Bogus registration worked fine. Thank you!
Although to be honest page 2 was a bit of a let down.
Berzin said:Are you crazy? Page 2 was the best part!!!
The way he describes how Armstrong should apologize, and how people (and more importantly, his corporate sponsors) will forgive him because he's "saved people"-man, that is comedy gold!!
Armstrong the Televangelist!!! Healing the cancer-stricken one plastic yellow bracelet at a time!!! HAHAHA!!!
I recommend the reading of page 2. It is the essence of the article.
Tubeless said:Their registration does not check the validity of the email address (or any other data) you enter. You get to read the article immediately after entering bogus info about yourself. So no privacy concerns here.
Berzin said:I'm shocked at the type of dishonest behavior you're advocating, Tubeless.
Simply shocked.
You know it's a slippery from this to blood transfusions, don't you?
Seriously, you guys should read the other article this guy wrote on Armstrong back in 2001. It's in one of the side links to the article.
That one is another doozy. I almost vomited.
flicker said:Micheal Hall and the haters on this forum are quite clueless about pro-cycling.
Tubeless said:Which one is worse - copying copyrighted material to another web site, or hiding behind an email address or alias that can't be tracked?
Speaking of which - what's your real name?
Berzin said:I'm shocked at the type of dishonest behavior you're advocating, Tubeless.
Simply shocked.
You know it's a slippery from this to blood transfusions, don't you?
Seriously, you guys should read the other article this guy wrote on Armstrong back in 2001. It's in one of the side links to the article.
That one is another doozy. I almost vomited.
Polish said:+1
Clueless Cycling Fans and haters share the same views.
Not suprising. To be expected. Yawn.
SSDD
Berzin said:Did you see the smileys? I was joking.
jimmypop said:Boy, you said it, brother!
Now those of us who've suspected that Armstrong and others were on world-class PED programs are the ones that are ignorant. We're the ones who've had our head in the sand all these years, and we just don't have the balls to admit it! We're just not tough enough to accept that cheating is only practiced by the toughest, stronger competitors in the sport! It takes real ball to shell out a few million a year to a doctor who will monitor your PED program, to set up a personal distribution network, to bully those who dare speak out, and to ride a wave of support from those who genuinely want to support research into a terminal illness. That Armstrong, he's just the toughest show in town!
In reality, he was a scared, clueless and talented kid who could pedal a bike and who has been massaged by a group of opportunists his entire career. Unsurprisingly, he eventually became one of those opportunists himself.
Your rationalizations may change, and that's OK. It's a pretty thin veil at this point anyway. We all know that there are some who will choose to rationalize Armstrong's behavior for fear of losing the idol you've created in your mind.
I think it's been mentioned a few times before, but you should never go full ***.
Tubeless said:Their registration does not check the validity of the email address (or any other data) you enter. You get to read the article immediately after entering bogus info about yourself. So no privacy concerns here.
buckwheat said:C'mon, what's wrong with man love?
flicker said:Mike Hall, typical small man complex. Most likely drives a bright red F450. He is quite short has to sit on a stack of phone books to see over the dashboard, can barely reach the gas pedal. 44 colt python and a bible in glove box. Has gunsight zeroed in on the uniballer. Hates cycling and America as the US has subjegated the Republic of Texas.
Have to say by writing for the two great cycling journals Outside magazine and Texas monthly he will speak to many knowledgable cycling fans.
scribe said:I think the notion that Armstrong would feel compelled to jump on the doping bandwagon with EPO during the 95 tour because he was struggling to keep up.....according to Swart (inferred)...is a bit curious.
Is it safe then to assume he won his Worlds clean?
sartain said:Sadly, Colt is no more
masking_agent said:artilcles written, former team mate interviews, all damming yes, but is it going to lead to his downfall ? I hope so, but am starting to losing faith as I don't see much progress ? I have no clue where Novitsky is ? I just hope the Lance case, doesn't turn into another OJ Simpson case.