Don't retire, Sir Cav! You need 7 more MSR victories!
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Which is what I thought you were looking for since I don’t know why you’d look for the median. That’s random.
But their post said only counting the Tours Cavendish has won.
Cavendish has always been an emotional man, in touch with how he’s feeling and unafraid to show us. Taking him one win ahead of the great Eddy Merckx, the 35th victory should have brought euphoria but that is to imagine he’s like every other superstar. After hugging his kids, kissing his wife, embracing his team-mates and having been touched on the shoulder by pretty much every rider in this Tour, he turned to a TV interviewer and softly said: “I don’t know how I’m feeling. I’m ecstatic but I don’t feel I’m bouncing off the walls. Almost like a relief, like a weight’s been lifted. I’ve had 19 days at home [this year] but we’ve got this year and then we [his family] have got all the time in the world. I’m sorry I’m not bouncing.”
Perhaps this was nothing more than a mature and heartfelt response to what he’s been through. After four stage victories at the 2016 Tour, things went wrong for Cavendish and he wouldn’t win at the Tour for another five years. Early in 2017 he contracted the Epstein-Barr virus and he crashed out of that year’s Tour. The year after he failed to make the time cut on stage 11 and wasn’t even selected by his team for the 2019 Tour. Through this period he suffered from depression and he learnt about life.
We spoke over a coffee in a bar near Alicante last December when he was immersed in another training camp, a week before Christmas. And he said something so profound that he’s the only athlete who could have said it. “You see with a lot of sportspeople who become successful very young, they’re never told ‘no’ or they’re wrong. And it’s usually from people who have something to gain from them. Once things aren’t going their way, then these people kind of f*** off and people who actually matter, who were the ones saying ‘no’ before but weren’t listened to, they are the ones that are still there.”
This is true, but without the illness wiping out some wins, Merckx record would simply have been surpassed in an everyday race win rather than being a project 35 as such. In many ways, Cav did it in the toughest, most-pressured way it could be done and that imo makes it even sweeter.It’s actually scary to think without some of the injuries he could have won “more” (obviously who knows how long he would have ridden if his career didn’t get derailed by mono and injuries)
But it's the same with Pogacar and his "entourage". And what about some teams (f.i. UAE) sponsored by criminal regimes....Well done Cav. Just a shame about who your manager is !
2.993, for what it's worth.Well, the original post said median, so it would be more random to have calculated the mean.
Now we need to find the geometric mean.
4+6+5+5+3+2+1+4+4+1=35/10=3.5
They then rounded up to get the mean of 4.
I may be open to bribes...I had a dream today that Felix Großschartner would win the Tour of Austria and the not yet existing Felix Großschartner thread would become a sticky thread too. I think I'm spending too much time on this forum.
I thought that was interesting that they included Eddie's nickname. They are not making a mistake. The note below the picture says the British sprinter beat the mythic record of Eddie Merckx, nicknamed "the Cannibal."A misunderstanding? Cannonball versus cannibal?
Because that’s what I thought they were looking for. While we’re at it, the mode is 4 as well just off the Tours Cav won in.Well, the original post said median, so it would be more random to have calculated the mean.
Now we need to find the geometric mean.
Since you inquired: the median is not skewed by outliers. It's the "typical" value. "Average" in the non-technical sense. When do you think median is an appropriate metric?Which is what I thought you were looking for since I don’t know why you’d look for the median. That’s random.
I stipulated that we'd ignore zeros, since he already got one. When he's on, he's on.But Mark has a few 0, right?
Thanks but I can do it in my head. The mode is also 4 but neither are as good as the mean.Order from lowest to highest and the median becomes obvious
1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6
When talking about someone’s income.Since you inquired: the median is not skewed by outliers. It's the "typical" value. "Average" in the non-technical sense. When do you think median is an appropriate metric?
For all practical purposes, a day off.Stage 1: vomiting, suffering in the heat, fighting time limit in a TTT
Stage 2: dropping and doing a TTT
Stage 3: stuck behind a crash
Stage 4: nice leisurely ride
Stage 5: win
Stage 6: warning, mechanical, and starts car surfing that would make Nibali and Vino proud but resulted in a fine
What does stage 7 hold?