Sometimes you get dust in your eyes
View: https://twitter.com/NBCSCycling/status/1808534902763110415
View: https://twitter.com/NBCSCycling/status/1808534902763110415
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
This completely. Watching that overhead shot, if you didn't know it was Cav you would have thought it was some crazy 22 year old or something. That's the part that is really something else, at least to me.Today wasn’t some freak thing. Cavendish has still got the straight speed to compete for stages. All his ups and downs have somewhat dampened just how dominant he has always been in sprints when he is at his best. He is older and his reflexes aren’t what they used to be, but he is still extremely fast. What separates him from aging sprinters in the past is that Cavendish has never lost his nerve. Most guys can still ride fast as they age, it’s the deterioration of their other skills and the fact that as they get older, the risks of a sprint finish become more clear.
Cavendish has never lost his nerve in sprints. The crashes that could’ve mentally finished lesser riders didn’t dull his ability to block it out.
I don’t know but I can get behind it. Makes it easier to find for the upcoming stages.Why is this a sticky thread?
We don’t discuss moderation round here, capeesh?Why is this a sticky thread?
We don’t discuss moderation round here, capeesh?
Free Toby 2024Damn, see you Friday
Yes. Not to mention, the speed and physical attributes to win at the end of a stage are not the same as the absolute sprint capacity in either a sprint event or a criterium. It's nerves, but also physical resilience, skill, reading the race.Today wasn’t some freak thing. Cavendish has still got the straight speed to compete for stages. All his ups and downs have somewhat dampened just how dominant he has always been in sprints when he is at his best. He is older and his reflexes aren’t what they used to be, but he is still extremely fast. What separates him from aging sprinters in the past is that Cavendish has never lost his nerve. Most guys can still ride fast as they age, it’s the deterioration of their other skills and the fact that as they get older, the risks of a sprint finish become more clear.
Cavendish has never lost his nerve in sprints. The crashes that could’ve mentally finished lesser riders didn’t dull his ability to block it out.
For the day that's in it, I thought some people might appreciate it, and I believe it causes almost zero disruption to anyone that doesn't particularly need it. Is there a difficulty with it being stickied?Why is this a sticky thread?
For the day that's in it, I thought some people might appreciate it, and I believe it causes almost zero disruption to anyone that doesn't particularly need it. Is there a difficulty with it being stickied?
I have no intention of doing it for every stage winner. If I am still a mod when someone other than Cavendish hits 36 (or whatever target he leaves) I might do it again then.No, I just thought that it was unprecedented for a rider thread to be stickied so I thought it might have been a mistake.
Of course, if you really wanted to cause a ruckus on here, you could rename the thread to 'Mark Cavendish is officially better than Eddy Merckx thread'I have no intention of doing it for every stage winner. If I am still a mod when someone other than Cavendish hits 36 (or whatever target he leaves) I might do it again then.
Is there a public comment from Eddy Merckx?
Thanks for sharing these. Great to hear from Renshaw and from G. Love what he said about dropping the bike
I mean, it's a ridiculous precedentFor the day that's in it, I thought some people might appreciate it, and I believe it causes almost zero disruption to anyone that doesn't particularly need it. Is there a difficulty with it being stickied?
They say my spelling is terrible. But my math ain’t too shabby. I ran the numbers with your data and came up with at least 41 wins.Fun fact, he's only won a single stage at the TDF one time (2015). His median number of victories if he wins at least once (which he has done 10 times now) is 4.
Because it should be!Why is this a sticky thread?