• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Teams & Riders Mark Cavendish Discussion Thread

Page 62 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
elfed68 said:
There's a rumour that he might be going to BMC as well floating on Twitter?
He'd have a pretty good sprint train in MTN with EBH as last man.

Yes, he'd have a pretty good sprint train, but the strength of the train would be way way less than Etixx or Sky. All 8 men before him make a massive difference to dominate a line, it is not good enough to have 2 fast men and 2 strong flat riders. That is why a rider like Tony Martin or Wiggins are one of the best riders to have in your train.
MTN certainly do not have a strong enough squad in terms of depth for Cavendish nor the financial ability to get him.
 
Any news on what happened to him in stage 21? He wasn't out-kicked -- he was out of position last corner, got gapped, had to close the gap, and by the time he was back the sprint had already started. Maybe he slipped on the wet roads -- the slow motion sprint video showed wheels sliding all over the road.

He's proven over and over he can handle himself without a coordinated leadout in the final meters if necessary. He won his stage this year this way. You didn't see Quickstep at the front at all in the final km on stage 21.
 
djconnel said:
Any news on what happened to him in stage 21? He wasn't out-kicked -- he was out of position last corner, got gapped, had to close the gap, and by the time he was back the sprint had already started. Maybe he slipped on the wet roads -- the slow motion sprint video showed wheels sliding all over the road.

He's proven over and over he can handle himself without a coordinated leadout in the final meters if necessary. He won his stage this year this way. You didn't see Quickstep at the front at all in the final km on stage 21.
According to Brian Holm he was sick. They weren't even sure if he would participate in the sprint or not.
 
Ruby United said:
elfed68 said:
There's a rumour that he might be going to BMC as well floating on Twitter?
He'd have a pretty good sprint train in MTN with EBH as last man.

Yes, he'd have a pretty good sprint train, but the strength of the train would be way way less than Etixx or Sky. All 8 men before him make a massive difference to dominate a line, it is not good enough to have 2 fast men and 2 strong flat riders. That is why a rider like Tony Martin or Wiggins are one of the best riders to have in your train.
MTN certainly do not have a strong enough squad in terms of depth for Cavendish nor the financial ability to get him.

He'd have Rohan Dennis at BMC.
 
He needs more than a train, he needs a real TEAM whose full time job is "Cav sprint train"
Martin, Stybar, Kwiatek are fantastic riders but its better to have a group who know their role and are maximum motivated to win sprint stages for their sprinter.
Many people has been saying Cav has been washed up the past couple years, he's younger than Gripel. When he stopped dominating was when he went to Sky and now Etixx where his leadout train is kind of an all-star team but really doesn't get it done most of the time. When Cav stopped dominating the tour, it was Kittel, a guy with a full-on lead out train working for him and no other ambitions for the team. Same with Andre and Lotto. Cav is still good enough to win a stage or two vs this, but if he wants to be at the top he needs to find a team with a similar situation. Going to be tough.

It would be funny if Kittel left Giant because of the polemics over his tour non-selection and Cav went there. Degenkolb can do the classics and vuelta or something and Cav for the tour with full support.
 
Jul 27, 2014
376
0
0
Visit site
I might actually give a detailed analysis/opinion of something for the first time ever:

Mark Cavendish for 5 years was a totally dominant sprinter who won everything by miles, no matter where he started from, some of his sprints were more like 250 metre attacks than sprint finishes. The one when he caught the breakaway alone when he was with team sky was a very memorable victory, and of course his MSR win was special.

It has always been said that Cav has had the strongest team to win, and it is true that the supreme HTC train which IMO is the most dominant sprint train ever helped Cavendish, Greipel and Goss win many many more races than they would have without. In 2009 when he won 6 stages, his team was incredible, I don't think Etixx if they tried especially for Cav could even match it. The team was:
Cav
Mark Renshaw (best leadout man in the world)
Bernie Eisel (always knew where to be)
Bert Grabsch (2008 TT WC)
Maxime Monfort (Former TT NC)
Kim Kirchen (Former TT NC)
Tony Martin (wasn't actually the best time trialist in the world ATM)
Michael Rogers (3 time TT WC)
George Hincapie(Classics Specialist)

Now that team is just phenomenal, and they led from km 1 until 200m to go, where Renshaw would always always drop Cavendish off. Compare that with this tour, there was less sprint stages and Cavendish was probably only dropped off in a good position once, and greipel still beat him, so the chance of him winning the sprint has already decreased, since position is everything.

Let's compare that to what Etixx can offer him now, if they really really tried.
Renshaw
Trentin
Sabatini
Martin
Kwiatkowski
Terpstra
Keisse
Van Keirslbulck/Vanderburgh
(Stybar may be in there somewhere)

I don't believe that for a second this team could match the 2009 team for power and dominance, and they always have 2 mountain goats anyway. So already the knackered worn out old Manxman has lost a lot of his advantage.

Now the second point, opposition. Apart from HTC there were not really many other focused teams that could compete for the front of the bunch, normally you just had Julian dean and Tyler farrar getting in the way, whereas today. You have Lotto with Greipel, Katusha for Kristoff and Giant Alpecin, all 3 are powerful teams that can knock Etixx off of the front, and Cav never had to deal with that before 2012.

Next we have actual sprint opposition, in 2009 there was Thor Hushovd, Tyler farrar, Ciolek, Dumoulin, Boonen. Obviously these were the best sprinters at the time ( don't really know where Petacchi was that year) but I don't really think that they are really is fast as today's sprinters are.(Not forgetting that in 2012 Goss was quite good but what happened to him?) Today Cav has to face Greipel, Kristoff, Bouhanni, Degenkolb, Sagan, Kittel. I believe these are much faster than what he is used to.

Then you have the idea of age and if Cavendish really has lost it. Personally I think he has been looking very laboured this tour, and there has got to be some reason for this. Is it possible that he has lost speed or is it just acceleration? Has he burnt out after the years of bodily torture? I think that inevitably he has lost a bit of his kick as he's got to 30, but look at other 30 year old cyclists, vroome won the tour, Contador won the giro, terpstra won Paris Roubaix last year, Wiggins broke the hour record, greipel is 33 himself. Is it the case that 30 year old riders are done, I don't think so.

Then you have confidence, Cav said himself that confidence plays a big part in sprinting, in 2009 when he worshipped his own shrine, he KNEW that he wouldn't be beaten and if he was beaten he would just show it was a fluke the next day. If he loses his confidence he won't win as many races and I believe that that is what has happened.

For me MTN cannot offer a strong enough train unless they just intend to kick off from 2k to go. He has been linked with Trek, he would have Cance some invisible guy probably Renshaw but who else? BMC are wttc so that might be a good mov e but they are looking after tj and Cav wouldn't be focused on. Which team would actually focus solely on Cavendish from now on? I can't think of many.

The only thing that is guaranteed his that we will find out how bad the problem is, that will likely be in the ToB when he will come up against Kittel for the first time this year.
 
Jul 21, 2015
32
0
0
Visit site
Cav will leave Etixx as i don't think Lefevere believes he can justify paying cav £3million per year after his results this year. Don't forget Fernando Gaviria joins soon so cut cav loose
 
He isn't able to repeat his sprint in the MSR he won or in that Tour stage where he passed LL Sanchez like a rocket. Hence, his speed is not the same anymore (and certainly not when we also take into account that he also was better uphill in those years).

He can say whatever he wants, but it's not true that he's as fast as he was.
 
Aug 6, 2015
50
0
0
Visit site
i think the move to MTN is a great one.
He'll be under less pressure in races and a great ambassador for Qhubeka. Like him or not he is a big brand and the publicity will do wonders for the charity :)