Media amnesia and reactions

Page 12 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 16, 2009
1,429
1
10,485
cineteq said:
You sound like Samuel Sanchez.


You know what I mean, I'm sick of riders telling me that people or teams are clean. The riders can't prove it but the teams can be transparent.
 
Jun 16, 2009
1,429
1
10,485
Didn't see those interviews I'm afraid.

What is it that suddenly stops bike riders talking about it when they become really good then?

Serious question. Are they sick of talking about it by then or are they all on it or is there an other influence affecting how forthright they are in the press?
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
bobbins said:
Why? He's a bike rider. Let the self promotion specialists like Millar talk the talk. As long as Wiggins wins clean then that's fine by me. His team need to sort out their terrible PR but it's not up to him to take it upon himself to be spokesman. You must have seen his interviews? He's not that comfortable and won't come across great so best to keep his head down and get on with the day job.

And by wins clean I mean passes the tests and is happy for his team to be transparent. He may need to move teams though.

So in 2007 he can throw his kit in the bin and crack the sads at dopers, but in 2012 he needs to STFU and pass the tests?

Good good.
 
Jun 16, 2009
1,429
1
10,485
Dear Wiggo said:
So in 2007 he can throw his kit in the bin and crack the sads at dopers, but in 2012 he needs to STFU and pass the tests?

Good good.


Like I said, something seems to happen to make this stop.
 
Oct 12, 2012
169
0
0
Some media reactions that were published in the German maganzine "Der Spiegel":

Spain

&quot said:
It's official now. Lance Armstrong did never exist. The UCI sentences him to be forgotten.

&quot said:
UCI put the disgraced Armstrong on the Guillotine. The texan and his era are stricken from cycling history. But the gouverning body goes too far in its attempt to uncover the past. Instead of saving cycling they darg it down even more.
:eek:WTF

&quot said:
Armstrong disappears from cycling history. The UCI punishment is exemplary.

&quot said:
The causa Armstrong will not only take down the Texan. The UCI, too, is punch-drunk and without credibility. Their image was tarnished before. The Armstrong fraud shows zhat the root of all evil is not in the peloton alone.

&quot said:
The fall of Armstrong is not a desaster, it's a catharsis. Armstrong was the evil Sherriff and it is good that all of cycling knows it now.

more countries to follow
 
Oct 12, 2012
169
0
0
more media snippets

Italy

&quot said:
Armstrong wiped out. Game Over. An era has ended. It's a historical turn-around but also a missed chance. Pat McQuaid would have had to apologize for the ineptitude of cyclings gouverning body.

&quot said:
Cycling wipes out Lance Armstrong

&quot said:
Armstrong was stripped of his seven Titles. Cycling lies in ruins.

&quot said:
Better late than never. Armstrong is gone. All that remains is hope.

&quot said:
The End of a Myth
 
Mar 13, 2009
2,932
55
11,580
The Washington Post hasn't spent a lot of space on this, and Sally Jenkins has been notably silent. She was an integral part of his communication/PR team and has absolutely no chance of having us believe that she was "duped". It was her that "duped" the many unknowledgable Armstrong followers.
 
Mar 13, 2009
2,932
55
11,580
Mrs John Murphy said:
It would be interesting to contrast with say German and French reactions.

Thanks for the roundup.

Michel Drucker, a popular variety show host who interviewed Armstrong around the time of his comeback, was on the nightly news a few days ago and said how he still had a lot of admiration for Armstrong and how he will remember him for his athletic exploits and the good he has done. The next day on the radio many were questioning how Drucker could have made these statements given what we now know. It has become very difficult to defend the fraud. Drucker was one of those who exist for their relationships with the "stars" and was very easily manipulated as were so many others.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
I want to be a supporter of Armstrong.

Cycling got the patron it deserved.

Cant cut the head off a monster without a new head gonna replace it.



THIS

IS

CYCLING
 
May 3, 2010
2,662
0
0
Writing a book or spending time in therapy.

I'm guessing the reason why some CN hacks are keeping a low profile at the moment is that it is hard to write in between appointments at the shrink as they work out how the **** they are going to respin and rewrite their own histories.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
fat_boy_fat said:
This Millard Baker guy in the comments makes me sick. :mad:

a demand media/liesrong intern.

They inhabit the interweb trying their damnedest to obfuscate the comment sections and failing miserably.
 
Jul 11, 2009
283
0
0
Benotti69 said:

I love Betsy's comment on that 2nd article!

Looky here - from the Washington City Paper in July 2009 where Ms. Jenkins defense of Armstrong comes faster than the dumping of him by any of his sponsors. http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2009/07/16/playing-the-feud™-celebrity-edition/ Ms. Jenkins, you're an embarrassment to journalists for whom integrity is a standard.
 

Latest posts