Member Suspension Appreciation/Depreciation Thread

Page 59 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Apr 30, 2011
47,189
29,833
28,180
python said:
because what of you wrote appears arrogant to me. the stupid bit is, as i said, related to it given your background.
Again: Why :confused: How is it arrogant. What does my background have to do with it? :confused:

It's quite obvious what will happen if you (keep) reposting deleted material. It's inevitable. It's perhaps the most stupid way to get banned imho.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Netserk said:

You quipped against him in the politics thread. It won't do to have yet another enemy in that thread, not if you are the thread's most active poster and trying to play "the centre".

But can't let it go either. So he clicks on your profile, finds a recent post he can attack from elsewhere and does so.
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
The Hitch said:
You quipped against him in the politics thread. It won't do to have yet another enemy in that thread, not if you are the thread's most active poster and trying to play "the centre".

But can't let it go either. So he clicks on your profile, finds a recent post he can attack from elsewhere and does so.
this is nonsense. i was very specific why a former mod posting in the thread about mod actions should be less arrogant.

but your intentional off topic should be noted as another attempt to counter in favour of your groupies.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,189
29,833
28,180
python said:
this is nonsense. i was very specific why a former mod posting in the thread about mod actions should be less arrogant.

but your intentional off topic should be noted as another attempt to counter in favour of your groupies.
You wasn't specific at all.
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
Netserk said:
You wasn't specific at all.
you was't unblind at all, you WAS deliberately blind.

to ignore a post like this just above with an underlined issue


python said:
such an arrogant, if not a stupid way for a former mod to express himself.

yeah, is not being specific :rolleyes:

no wonder, you are not a mod anymore.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
The Hitch said:
You quipped against him in the politics thread. It won't do to have yet another enemy in that thread, not if you are the thread's most active poster and trying to play "the centre".

But can't let it go either. So he clicks on your profile, finds a recent post he can attack from elsewhere and does so.

The irony if Python calling someone else arrogant is quite something though. But anyone that opens that politics thread probably get what they deserve.
 
Aug 5, 2010
11,027
89
22,580
Fearless Greg Lemond said:
Given the fact doc's ban is still not specified in the appropriate thread means he is a sockpuppet?

Berzin seems to always forget to update the thread. . . anyway i did it now
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
The Hitch said:
Who are the clinic 12? Identity wise I mean. Mas, Hog, Radio, Bro, TFF, who else?

It's a good question. But most of them are currently suspended. :p

I would put Digger in there as well, for sure. Others change with the times.

BotanyBay would've definitely been in the Top 12, but he no longer posts.

Hugh
Scott
Mac
D_Queued
blackcat
Berzin

All longtime contributors that could easily fall under the banner.

Texpat & Betsy would seem to fall into more of a Board of Directors title than actual club members.

Not an easy one to answer if forced to stick to a Dozen.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Granville57 said:
It's a good question. But most of them are currently suspended. :p

I would put Digger in there as well, for sure. Others change with the times.

BotanyBay would've definitely been in the Top 12, but he no longer posts.

Hugh
Scott
Mac
D_Queued
blackcat
Berzin

All longtime contributors that could easily fall under the banner.

Texpat & Betsy would seem to fall into more of a Board of Directors title than actual club members.

Not an easy one to answer if forced to stick a Dozen.

Polish, flicker?
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
The Hitch said:
Polish, flicker?

By definition, I'll say no. :p

I think it typically refers more to the pitchfork crew, and tends to exclude the attempted counter-weight of the loons on the other side. :D
 
Jul 9, 2009
7,880
1,292
20,680
How the **** can ChewbacaD ****ing get banned for ****ing vulgarity when this ****ing forum has a ****ing Mary Poppins ****ing filter that ****ing blanks out mother****ing **** Pound?
 
Aug 9, 2010
6,255
2
17,485
Hugh Januss said:
How the **** can ChewbacaD ****ing get banned for ****ing vulgarity when this ****ing forum has a ****ing Mary Poppins ****ing filter that ****ing blanks out mother****ing **** Pound?

that's what I was wondering...:confused:
I saw the mf post…
is it 'what we are thinking?'
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
Hugh Januss said:
How the **** can ChewbacaD ****ing get banned for ****ing vulgarity when this ****ing forum has a ****ing Mary Poppins ****ing filter that ****ing blanks out mother****ing **** Pound?

Swearing openly is a privilege reserved only for the likes of Mark Cavendish, Bradley Wiggins, and Lance Armstrong, when the are speaking with Dan Benson, and when it is to be printed on the CN homepage.

Think of the kids, Hugh. THINK OF THE CHILDREN! :eek:
 
Jan 12, 2014
142
0
0
The status says: "banned", but the green light is on and ChewbacaD is listed on the on-line members list.
Unclear situation.
 
Apr 3, 2009
12,645
8,557
28,180
Hugh Januss said:
How the **** can ChewbacaD ****ing get banned for ****ing vulgarity when this ****ing forum has a ****ing Mary Poppins ****ing filter that ****ing blanks out mother****ing **** Pound?

Where there's a f@cking will, there's a f@cking way...

Not supposed to circumvent the software folks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.