- Jul 9, 2009
- 7,881
- 1,292
- 20,680
red_flanders said:Where there's a ****!ing will, there's a ****!ng way...
Not supposed to circumvent the software folks.
No sh!t.
red_flanders said:Where there's a ****!ing will, there's a ****!ng way...
Not supposed to circumvent the software folks.
sittingbison said:that would be Dick Pound
gentle(wo)men, chewie is well aware of my position on his intemperate posts.
The Hitch said:No turning back now mew, finish the post![]()
Don't be late Pedro said:
the sceptic said:Really appreciate the bannings of EnacheV and Ventoux boar. Hopefully permanent next time.
Maybe it would be shorter for a poster with a different history.BigMac said:I wonder if the duration of each sentence is subjective to each moderator (amongst the ones who hand the ban)?
Do all the members who ''insult the staff'' get a three month ban? It honestely seems quite exagerate to me.
I think the duration of the ban should be shortened.
Netserk said:Maybe it would be shorter for a poster with a different history.
Context.
BigMac said:Ok makes sence, thanks for claryfing.Had he ever been banned for insulting though?
Netserk said:So sceptic has been banned with no note.
Smells like Berzin...
Does anyone know why?
Could it be posted in the official suspension thread?Wallace and Gromit said:The bans for Sceptic and Martin Vickers both result from their rather nasty spat on the Sky thread on Sunday evening.
ebandit said:very clever zam..............did oscar pistorius say that?
Mark L
