Member Suspension Appreciation/Depreciation Thread

[Netserk]

Are you reffering to that mistake you made when you banned me for being a sockpuppet....then unbanned me when you realised you didn't know what you were doing?

Yes....horsinabout was pretty obvious.....not to Sceptic though.....can't think why not

Mark L

I never banned you. That happened before my time, so even a plural 'you' doesn't make a lot of sense.

 

[ebandit]

Mark. I can't take you seriously if you are going to compare me to a Nazi.

Would you be more comfortable with a comparison with Stasi?

and you are definitely trolling if you don't think vickers was a troll.

I think you are a troll, sceptic

Mark L

 

[Granville57]

So......you dropped the J bomb on Davey...

Yes....horsinabout was pretty obvious....

I don't understand the past tense. That account is still active.

 

[the sceptic]

Would you be more comfortable with a comparison with Stasi?



I think you are a troll, sceptic

Mark L

I will leave it up to the mods to deal with your personal attacks.

Get back to me when you can have a civil conversation.

 

[ebandit]

Ja...I mean yes

Mark L

 

[TheSpud]

ball, not man.

Surely Horse, or is it Elephant now?

 

[ebandit]

Mods, can you investigate Sceptic please.

I think he is one of Hog's sockpuppets.

Mark L

 

[ebandit]

I never banned you. That happened before my time, so even a plural 'you' doesn't make a lot of sense.

Apologies....I've gone back and checked.....it was palmerq

Mark L

 

[The Hitch]

I never banned you. That happened before my time, so even a plural 'you' doesn't make a lot of sense.

Hmm. If that is the case then perhaps you would like to apologize to netserk ebandit?

Edit: good to see that you did.

Perhaps now you won't complain about people accusing your favourite riders of doping, seeing as how youve shown you have no problem with accusing people of things when the discussion isn't about your favourite riders.

 

[the sceptic]

well at least he didn't call him a nazi.

 

[ebandit]

Hmm. If that is the case then perhaps you would like to apologize to netserk ebandit?

Edit: good to see that you did.

Perhaps now you won't complain about people accusing your favourite riders of doping, seeing as how youve shown you have no problem with accusing people of things when the discussion isn't about your favourite riders.

Perhaps now you'll stop baiting

Mark L

 

[The Hitch]

Perhaps now you'll stop baiting

Mark

how am j baiting?

 

[ebandit]

Jumping in to an issue that is none of your business in order to launch a snide off-topic attack.....I'd say that is clear as daylight baiting

Mark L

 

[The Hitch]

Jumping in to an issue that is none of your business in order to launch a snide off-topic attack.....I'd say that is clear as daylight baiting

Mark L

I disagree that it's none of my business. You brought it up in an existing discussion. A discussion that was a continuation of a post in which you called me out by name. You Cant then after making an error shut down and claim it's not my business. If it was private you could have accuses netserk by pm. You didn't. You did it here for all the forum to see and celebrated with a smiley.

 

[ebandit]

I disagree that it's none of my business. You brought it up in an existing discussion. A discussion that was a continuation of a post in which you called me out by name. You Cant then after making an error shut down and claim it's not my business. If it was private you could have accuses netserk by pm. You didn't. You did it here for all the forum to see and celebrated with a smiley.

I brought up my mistaken banning because I thought that was what Netserk was alluding to...and I misremembered him as being the mod in question....it was after all several years ago

....none of which is any of your 'kin business despite your feeble attempts to make it so.

You were mentioned by me giving an example of how you (and others) like to dehumanise people with epithets whether it be troll, bot or whatever.....I find it particularly unpleasant......your comments in particular about Martin were something straight out of 1984.....

......he was a far superior poster to you by any measure....so I'm not surprised you are trying to render him an unperson

Mark L

 

[red_flanders]

I'm sure glad I bumped this thread to give the mods some positive feedback...

 

[Dear Wiggo]

I'm sure glad I bumped this thread to give the mods some positive feedback...

Me too.

A round of drinks for the mods.

 

[The Hitch]

I brought up my mistaken banning because I thought that was what Netserk was alluding to...and I misremembered him as being the mod in question....it was after all several years ago

....none of which is any of your 'kin business despite your feeble attempts to make it so.

You were mentioned by me giving an example of how you (and others) like to dehumanise people with epithets whether it be troll, bot or whatever.....I find it particularly unpleasant......your comments in particular about Martin were something straight out of 1984.....

......he was a far superior poster to you by any measure....so I'm not surprised you are trying to render him an unperson

Mark L

You post something in the forum, you cannot say it is private. Its been tried before by others and failed.

I had every right to respond to your post. Afterall youve never had any problem responding to me when I am having discussions with other posters.

You often in the clinic attack people for making accusations without evidence. In fact you did it recently against bobbins did you not, only about a week ago.

And now in this thread you yourself, turn 180 degrees and launch an accusation against netserk with no evidence. You did it in public not in private (if you can't tell the difference look it up). That means it is fair game for me to point out your hypocrisy.

As for me baiting, you still haven't explained how I did that, though I would observe that telling me that I was an inferior poster to the god awful now banned troll that was martinvickers, does constitute a form of baiting, though a rather weak one, so I have no incentive to bite

 

[42x16ss]

how am j baiting?

I wouldn't question the master - if anyone knows baiting...

 

[ebandit]

You post something in the forum, you cannot say it is private. Its been tried before by others and failed.

I had every right to respond to your post. Afterall youve never had any problem responding to me when I am having discussions with other posters.

You often in the clinic attack people for making accusations without evidence. In fact you did it recently against bobbins did you not, only about a week ago.

And now in this thread you yourself, turn 180 degrees and launch an accusation against netserk with no evidence. You did it in public not in private (if you can't tell the difference look it up). That means it is fair game for me to point out your hypocrisy.

As for me baiting, you still haven't explained how I did that, though I would observe that telling me that I was an inferior poster to the god awful now banned troll that was martinvickers, does constitute a form of baiting, though a rather weak one, so I have no incentive to bite

I love how my mentioning a mistaken ban was "launching an attack"...........that would be why I put a big smiley wouldn't it..,.........I know you'll struggle with this because your sense of humour is not very developed......
..but of course the key point is that the issue was dine and dusted, the mistake apologised for case closed before you posted.......and yet here you are poking your nose in trying to stir.........so, yes, pretty clear trolling

Yes.......in my view Martin was far superior to you......his arguments were based on solid logic and fact whereas you just puff up a load of exagerrations and use them as premises on which to build an argument.........I lament his demise.......but I note again your attempt to dehumanise him

Mark L

 

[the sceptic]

Martin has never made an argument based on solid logic and facts.

 

[The fridge in the blue trees]

You post something in the forum, you cannot say it is private. Its been tried before by others and failed.

And he never said it's private.

Maybe apologize to ebandit for distorting what he was saying?

 

[ebandit]

And he never said it's private.

Maybe apologize to ebandit for distorting what he was saying?

I think Hitch's argument is that he should be free to stir up a resolved very minor issue and contort it into something completely different because....

A) its on a forum

B) in an entirely unrelated matter, I mentioned him, which therefore renders this entirely unrelated matter his business

Mark L

 

[Semper Fidelis]

I'm sure glad I bumped this thread to give the mods some positive feedback...

Good on ya for that.

Now get back to "something less offensive"!

These guys are like that little pink bunny.

 

[The Hitch]

Perhaps you could explain to me Ebandit why when sceptic says another poster is being a sockpuppet, or when I say a banned poster was a troll, that is your business, but when you have a discussion with another poster somehow that becomes no one else's business and you jump to accusations of trolling when someone else gets involved?

No arguments to defend the divine right of ebandit? Good, we can move on.

Before you dragged that one out (of course as usual you didn't actually answer the question of why you are allowed to.make accusations and no one else is, but never mind) I was going to comment on your 2 bizzaro posts where you compared sceptic first to himmler and then to the stasi. There are a number of posters here who I consider to be scum and liars and trolls, many of them keeping getting banned upon returning, and all have been caught out lying, but good lord comparing anyone on the internet to a Nazi mass murderer and to laugh off their complaint by suggesting they are more.like a murderous secret police is ****ed up.

I don't care if you don't think it's none of my business, comparing people to Nazis was actually explicitly mentioned as being one of the things posters absolutely Cant do, in the rules that were replaced last year, and a poster got perma banned for comparing a moderator to Eichman.

If you think being annoying on the internet or even trolling on it, is behaviour worthy of dropping in Nazi comparisons, then the depths of your delusion are far greater than what I imagined, and you have forever ceded the ground to everyone else in the forum, even the ones you consider trolls (though recently that seems to be pretty much everyone)