did anyone come across the actual clen concentration measured in rogers' urine sample ? i perused the available articles and did not find any.
a lot of unnecessary speculation (not the definitive conclusion on whether he doped) may be put to rest by this small technical detail !...
as many may remember, while conti's urine clen was very-very low (at the end of the day i changed my mind to a belief conti indeed transfused a 'glowing' bb), his case is very different from rogers'.
the reason for the above statement is based on 3 scientific easily verifiable facts: (i) we more or less know clen's clearance rates from human body (ii) the number of days rogers claims passed between the fatal chinese meal and the test
(iii) the sensitivity of the the tokyo wada lab test (that is, if it's comparable to the german lab).
a relatively large concentration after more than a week would indicate with high probability that rogers lied.
a reverse situation would require a more thorough investigation and increase the possibility it was the meal.