thehog
BANNED
Fearless Greg Lemond said:He should have stuck with the ol' and approved salbutamol puff then.
They should have but not as effective!
Broncular charging!
Fearless Greg Lemond said:He should have stuck with the ol' and approved salbutamol puff then.
Catwhoorg said:I think calling Clenbuterol non performance enhancing is a bit of stretch.
Burns fat like crazy at the very least.
Rollthedice said:.. some non performance enhancing drugs which nevertheless are on the banned list.
DirtyWorks said:I don't doubt the guy is a rolling pharmacy. We know many riders are at crazy low levels of body fat in 2012/13 with the ability to sustain EPO-like wattage, so much more at play.
however, it does raise a dilemma. Can you accept the sanction on something that did not occur, based on a convincing history of doping involvement without sanction?GuyIncognito said:You're devastated that a guy named in two previous doping scandals, that has one of the worst possible doped reputations of anyone in the history of the sport, has been nailed?
That doesn't reflect very well on you.
blackcat said:however, it does raise a dilemma. Can you accept the sanction on something that did not occur, based on a convincing history of doping involvement without sanction?
DirtyWorks said:He just failed the IQ test.
Rollthedice said:a Save the world peace race while using some non performance enhancing drugs which nevertheless are on the banned list.
proffate said:1) clen enhances performance
2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Cup_(cycling) It's 1.HC with a pretty ballin' (and glowing) roll of past winners.
GuyIncognito said:You're devastated that a guy named in two previous doping scandals, that has one of the worst possible doped reputations of anyone in the history of the sport, has been nailed?
That doesn't reflect very well on you.
veganrob said:HOw is Mick Rogers or anyone else a victim of the clinic? This is an internet forum.![]()
Dazed and Confused said:I think its more the Aussie angle. Could be wrong.
thehog said:Rogers to fight like Lance!
http://m.canberratimes.com.au/sport...ws-to-fight-doping-claims-20131219-2zo7o.html
python said:...the above statement is based on 3 scientific easily verifiable facts: (i) we more or less know clen's clearance rates from human body (ii) the number of days rogers claims passed between the fatal chinese meal and the test...
no_slipstream said:Aside from the contaminated meat theory, he could argue Clenbuterol is not performance enhancing. But I do know someone who can squat 350lbs, bench press 340 and could quite simply snap an S-works frame with his bare hands.
Though on the serious side, why compete in such insignificant races in China and Japan, where the meat is known to be dodgy.
darwin553 said:Well he has drawn the line in the sand which proclaims his innocence, there is no turning back now.
Rogers has spoken out publicly against doping throughout his career, given riders later found guilty of doping offences had previously denied him major international medals.
Netserk said:Not that I know very much (if any) about how this works, but wouldn't it (the glow-time after he left China) also depend on how many days he ate meat in China? I'd guess that if it took 2-3 days after one meal (Assumption as I don't know which amounts the 2-3 days refer to), then it should take longer if he ate plenty for a whole week, right?
Ferminal said:In that case I'm still waiting for the plausible explanations for not doping whilst paying Michele Ferrari tens/hundreds of thousands.
BroDeal said:Although it might be satisfying to see Rogers finally go down and ironic that it is for something he likely did not do, this case highlights how the anti-doping framework has been set up by zealots and corrupt bureaucrats. Having no lower limit on a substance that is a known food contaminant in many countries shows how little care has been taken to align the doping regs with the realities of international competition. It has led to people's lives being destroyed for little fault of their own.
Aside from the fanatics like Tygart, the anti-dopers are cynical people engaged in a public relations effort. If innocent athletes get destroyed, even though guilty ones get away, then that is okay because the authorities can point to the poor SOB who ate at the wrong restaurant and say, "We caught one and we going to throw the book at him." This is just another form of corruption.
Things will get even worse if WADA moves to four year bans. While it is easy to say that Rogers had it coming, what about the young Belgian rider?
This ends justifies the means approach to fighting doping is little different than the way Armstrong justified his own actions.