I actually think he has become one of the overrated riders in the peloton. That he hasn't had enough opportunities for himself to shine is a myth. He had dozens of opportunities in GTs and other WT races and he never delivered. And with delivered I mean won. His biggest win to date is probably his GC win in Giro del Trentino or a Giro stage win. That's not enough for a rider who is beeing considered an ultra
mythical climber. Of course on his day he is one of the best climbers in the world, but right now I'm putting him in the bottom half of top10 climbers list. The problem for him is the TT, where he is one of the worst GC riders. So he is who he is, a very very good climber, who can at times win a mountain stage and top5 (and occasionally podium) a WT stage race.
I said before the Giro and the Vuelta that he shouldn't have had a full team commited to him, especially in a team as strong as Bahrain, with many strong cards to play, and I was proven right. I know Mikel had bad luck in the Giro and in the end it played out well for Bahrain both in the Giro and the Tour, and they are still doing well in the Vuelta despite a disappointing Landa. But I think for the future they should change their tactics. Landa should still get the opportunity to be the GC leader in a GT, but at least split the team in half and give a Mohorič, a Padun, a Colbrelli freedom to do their own thing. Maybe it would only help Landa with taking some pressure off his shoulders before the race.