Re: Re:
It had little to do with their racing styles. I really don't think Banesto had a choice, they had to keep Jiménez and get rid of Olano.
On the one hand a large part of the decision was Olano's ludicrous salary. Jiménez at his peak was being paid nearly €700.000 (or so he bragged) which is less than half what Olano made in 98 due to the bidding war with Kelme and others for Olano in late 96.
Saiz offered Olano just as much for 99 and Banesto couldn't match it. Remember, this was the peak of the contract war between them that started when ONCE signed the jewels of the Banesto amateur team (Sastre and the extremely promising Miguel Morras whose career was over almost immediately due to injury) so Banesto had already tied up large fees for 99 on Zulle and Garmendia (!!) just to piss off Saiz.
Then there's the PR angle. That also meant they couldn't keep Olano.
Cadena Ser are the trash that they are. In the 90s they had a huge number of listeners. They will make up whatever *** story they feel will give them ratings. Before the 1997 Tour the crap they fed was that Olano was the new Indurain and everyone should follow every excruciating detail of his life on Cadena Ser because he would be the new great champion.
After that season ended they shifted to Olano is the most overrated sportsperson in the history of the planet and deserves nothing short of death, while Jimenez is the new savior and god of our planet, kneel before him you puny mortals.
It was unfair and complete crap, but the fact is that people ate it up. Chaba became beloved by the masses as much as Olano was hated. Besides, nobody wanted to support Olano limiting losses on the climbs and winning those boring time trials. A hard working introverted athlete suffering to results is boring. Chaba's smile, jokes, panache and flair in the mountains are what people liked.
So PR wise it would be suicide to take Olano over Chaba.
They certainly couldn't keep both due to finances or PR and to top it all off it was a team chemistry nightmare.
Chaba went around yelling "Make firewood out of the apple tree" (Olano's surname is Manzano, "apple tree") at the 98 Vuelta and even supposedly had a t-shirt of it made later that season. You can't keep both guys after something like that.
I really don't see it as a choice, but as something they had to do.
Libertine Seguros said:Depends, remember Abarcá were left with an either/or choice between Olano and Jiménez, and chose Chava, who is very much the antithesis of conservative cycling. Maybe Chava was more Echavarrí's guy than Unzué's, but they stood by him through a lot.
It had little to do with their racing styles. I really don't think Banesto had a choice, they had to keep Jiménez and get rid of Olano.
On the one hand a large part of the decision was Olano's ludicrous salary. Jiménez at his peak was being paid nearly €700.000 (or so he bragged) which is less than half what Olano made in 98 due to the bidding war with Kelme and others for Olano in late 96.
Saiz offered Olano just as much for 99 and Banesto couldn't match it. Remember, this was the peak of the contract war between them that started when ONCE signed the jewels of the Banesto amateur team (Sastre and the extremely promising Miguel Morras whose career was over almost immediately due to injury) so Banesto had already tied up large fees for 99 on Zulle and Garmendia (!!) just to piss off Saiz.
Then there's the PR angle. That also meant they couldn't keep Olano.
Cadena Ser are the trash that they are. In the 90s they had a huge number of listeners. They will make up whatever *** story they feel will give them ratings. Before the 1997 Tour the crap they fed was that Olano was the new Indurain and everyone should follow every excruciating detail of his life on Cadena Ser because he would be the new great champion.
After that season ended they shifted to Olano is the most overrated sportsperson in the history of the planet and deserves nothing short of death, while Jimenez is the new savior and god of our planet, kneel before him you puny mortals.
It was unfair and complete crap, but the fact is that people ate it up. Chaba became beloved by the masses as much as Olano was hated. Besides, nobody wanted to support Olano limiting losses on the climbs and winning those boring time trials. A hard working introverted athlete suffering to results is boring. Chaba's smile, jokes, panache and flair in the mountains are what people liked.
So PR wise it would be suicide to take Olano over Chaba.
They certainly couldn't keep both due to finances or PR and to top it all off it was a team chemistry nightmare.
Chaba went around yelling "Make firewood out of the apple tree" (Olano's surname is Manzano, "apple tree") at the 98 Vuelta and even supposedly had a t-shirt of it made later that season. You can't keep both guys after something like that.
I really don't see it as a choice, but as something they had to do.