Moderators

Page 126 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
airstream said:
Generally speaking, current situation on the forum sometimes doesn't hold water. I even don't say about Florecita who is not a fan for me at all. Just spoiled child who decided to settle on the internet. But when one calls other troll just because of the fact one disagrees with other, it is just outrageous. To me, first of all, fan of the sport, it is a very sad that the best GT rider became an object of blind fanatism which shields any logic. It is funny to absurdity to read how one's fans are happy because of Armstrong's ban and feel sheer indignation after meteoric rise of team Sky. Contador was allegedly entitle to reach Olympus, but Sky boys are not entitled to throw him out of there because... Sky use illegal methods, whereas all of them always used appoximately the same. And this situation gave birth to one more type of fans who simply think 'anyone but Sky'. With such an aperitif, any drivel like 'the 2012 Tour was a joke due to absence of real climbers' [at the same marginal significance of the 2011 Giro is underlined and here and there because that race allegedly wasn't a joke]. Double standarts everywhere, even when they try to gain philosophical and ideological shell by means of some posters.

You dont like the cycling opinions of some posters on the Road cycling section.

Ok, so what does this have to do with the moderators?

I will however highlight 1 rule i think you have broken in your post.

." Blatant lying, baiting, or teasing other members will not be tolerated."
I even don't say about Florecita who is not a fan for me at all. Just spoiled child who decided to settle on the internet
 

airstream

BANNED
Mar 29, 2011
5,122
0
0
The Hitch said:
You dont like the cycling opinions of some posters on the Road cycling section.

Ok, so what does this have to do with the moderators?

I will however highlight 1 rule i think you have broken in your post.

." Blatant lying, baiting, or teasing other members will not be tolerated."

I just offer to ban for slander and baseless accusations of trolling.
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
The Hitch said:
You dont like the cycling opinions of some posters on the Road cycling section.

Ok, so what does this have to do with the moderators?

I will however highlight 1 rule i think you have broken in your post.

." Blatant lying, baiting, or teasing other members will not be tolerated."

Flipping hell :mad: Airstream wtf dude just stop it
 
Mar 10, 2009
6,158
1
0
Agh, classic off season bickering, just surprised Hitch is involved, what up there? Maybe time to lock down the racing forum section till the first race begins.
 
Dec 7, 2010
8,770
3
0
mewmewmew13 said:
I think someone said it was dirt.

Hugh Januss said:
Ah, well pretty sure he has hairy palms anyway.

There is so many things going on in that picture not to mention the feet.

The beer is enclosed in a redneck device known as a Kozzie or hugger. He has a "Party Food" cook book out like WTF ....HE IS NEVER going to THROW a party!
LMAO Then there is what looks like a scented candle next to the feet.
He has ONE stocking hanging up. Now that could be just for his daughter but what about the other members of the family??? do they not get a Christmas stocking??
From the looks of his cable box he is running Time Warner. OMG No fiber optics man???

Well he is not here to defend but it would be nice to know,,,,, what about the picture that got him banninated. Maybe it was his comments directed at someone else?
 
Dec 30, 2009
3,801
1
13,485
Glenn_Wilson said:
There is so many things going on in that picture not to mention the feet.

The beer is enclosed in a redneck device known as a Kozzie or hugger. He has a "Party Food" cook book out like WTF ....HE IS NEVER going to THROW a party!
LMAO Then there is what looks like a scented candle next to the feet.
He has ONE stocking hanging up. Now that could be just for his daughter but what about the other members of the family??? do they not get a Christmas stocking??
From the looks of his cable box he is running Time Warner. OMG No fiber optics man???

Well he is not here to defend but it would be nice to know,,,,, what about the picture that got him banninated. Maybe it was his comments directed at someone else?

The tartan pyjamas alone would have gotten him banninated if I got there first;)
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
given the amount of off-topic garbage, let me say clearly what in my opinion belongs in the thread and what many content-contributing posters would like to say,

thank you ferminal for banning the troll with the banning history only second to bpc.

i have only one, well perhaps, 2 questions...

1. why, given his multi-ban, 'last warning' history (over the entire existence of the forum) it is only one week ?

2. why this thread about moderators and their actions (which was previously rigorously cleaned and enforced ) why was it allowed to become the place of the removed/moderated images for which the troll was banned ? what has 'the look' image got to do with the tread other than an attempt at more trolling ? why the obvious and apparent trolling about the banned member feet, how much hair he he has etc, his habits whatever other garbage is allowed in the thread about the moderators ?

i anticipate claims of humour and such and we have seen the characters going in couples, yet there are plenty of other threads for joking and fun.

once again, thanks ferminal and the moderating crew for banning the troll.
 
Dec 30, 2009
3,801
1
13,485
python said:
given the amount of off-topic garbage, let me say clearly what in my opinion belongs in the thread and what many content-contributing posters would like to say,

thank you ferminal for banning the troll with the banning history only second to bpc.

i have only one, well perhaps, 2 questions...

1. why, given his multi-ban, 'last warning' history (over the entire existence of the forum) it is only one week ?

2. why this thread about moderators and their actions (which was previously rigorously cleaned and enforced ) why was it allowed to become the place of the removed/moderated images for which the troll was banned ? what has 'the look' image got to do with the tread other than an attempt at more trolling ? why the obvious and apparent trolling about the banned member feet, how much hair he he has etc, his habits whatever other garbage is allowed in the thread about the moderators ?

i anticipate claims of humour and such and we have seen the characters going in couples, yet there are plenty of other threads for joking and fun.

once again, thanks ferminal and the moderating crew for banning the troll.

I'm finding my feet here and didn't realise the history before my flippant post. I'm sure Ferminal or other mods will keep me right if my light touch approach does not work.
 
Jul 9, 2009
7,867
1,275
20,680
python said:
given the amount of off-topic garbage, let me say clearly what in my opinion belongs in the thread and what many content-contributing posters would like to say,

thank you ferminal for banning the troll with the banning history only second to bpc.

i have only one, well perhaps, 2 questions...

1. why, given his multi-ban, 'last warning' history (over the entire existence of the forum) it is only one week ?

2. why this thread about moderators and their actions (which was previously rigorously cleaned and enforced ) why was it allowed to become the place of the removed/moderated images for which the troll was banned ? what has 'the look' image got to do with the tread other than an attempt at more trolling ? why the obvious and apparent trolling about the banned member feet, how much hair he he has etc, his habits whatever other garbage is allowed in the thread about the moderators ?

i anticipate claims of humour and such and we have seen the characters going in couples, yet there are plenty of other threads for joking and fun.

once again, thanks ferminal and the moderating crew for banning the troll.

You wouldn't know humor if it bit you in the a$$. Why, of all the petty arguments in this thread do you go after the one you did, I wonder? Bad history maybe? I was not around for it but Chris must have really lit you up on some forum for you to have this much stored up animosity.
Really, do you have to weigh in with your $.02 every single time ChrisE farts around here, it just gets old and predictable after awhile. Isn't it enough that poor Chris has nothing left to defend? He has got to be damn near suicidal by now, do you want to be the one to put him over the edge?
Let's instead concentrate on the Hitch/Slipstream/LaFlo interaction and see if it blows up into something really interesting.
ChrisE is a breath of fresh a$$ around here and I for one look forward to his next addle-brained post with near breathless anticipation.;)
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
Hugh Januss said:
ChrisE farts around here
unlike you, i am not interested in his fatrs.

as the tread about the moderators implied, i am interested and thankful for in them removing the stench.
 
Jul 9, 2009
7,867
1,275
20,680
python said:
unlike you, i am not interested in his fatrs.

as the tread about the moderators implied, i am interested and thankful for in them removing the stench.

What's a fatrs?
 
Jul 23, 2009
2,891
1
0
Hugh Januss said:
You wouldn't know humor if it bit you in the a$$. Why, of all the petty arguments in this thread do you go after the one you did, I wonder? Bad history maybe? I was not around for it but Chris must have really lit you up on some forum for you to have this much stored up animosity.
Really, do you have to weigh in with your $.02 every single time ChrisE farts around here, it just gets old and predictable after awhile. Isn't it enough that poor Chris has nothing left to defend? He has got to be damn near suicidal by now, do you want to be the one to put him over the edge?
Let's instead concentrate on the Hitch/Slipstream/LaFlo interaction and see if it blows up into something really interesting.
ChrisE is a breath of fresh a$$ around here and I for one look forward to his next addle-brained post with near breathless anticipation.;)
Good post. When he's not posting some rather interesting and insightful information, python can usually be found chasing Chris and Glenn around the interwebs screaming, "Burn the witch!" I think their little three-way predates you, me, the derailleur, and probably cycling itself.
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
pedaling squares said:
python can usually be found chasing Chris and Glenn .
as a moderator of this forum, you personally can have no empowerment of speaking for anything but this forum.

me helping the moderating crew to ban a multiple-times banned troll/flamer/baiter chris e (who is proven only second to bpc in terms of the number of bans) and the typical defenders of the troll like glenn wilson (just like in this thread) who was also banned multiple times for for multiple sock puppets, trolling and given 'the last warning')..

i have little problem disagreeing with the contributors like that. and so should you if you are the moderator without an agenda.

i know for a fact that many members and current moderators feels no different. clearly, ferminal, but not YOU, did not tolerate the disruptive, obnoxious trolling.

that you chose to publicly make it personal against me and defend some of the most pernicious, proven trolls of the forum speaks to you being unfit for the job.
 
Mar 17, 2009
2,295
0
0
Hugh Januss said:
You wouldn't know humor if it bit you in the a$$. Why, of all the petty arguments in this thread do you go after the one you did, I wonder? Bad history maybe? I was not around for it but Chris must have really lit you up on some forum for you to have this much stored up animosity.
Really, do you have to weigh in with your $.02 every single time ChrisE farts around here, it just gets old and predictable after awhile. Isn't it enough that poor Chris has nothing left to defend? He has got to be damn near suicidal by now, do you want to be the one to put him over the edge?
Let's instead concentrate on the Hitch/Slipstream/LaFlo interaction and see if it blows up into something really interesting.
ChrisE is a breath of fresh a$$ around here and I for one look forward to his next addle-brained post with near breathless anticipation.;)

I suspect it's unrequited love. Makes him bitter :D
 
Jul 9, 2009
7,867
1,275
20,680
python said:
as a moderator of this forum, you personally can have no empowerment of speaking for anything but this forum.

me helping the moderating crew to ban a multiple-times banned troll/flamer/baiter chris e (who is proven only second to bpc in terms of the number of bans) and the typical defenders of the troll like glenn wilson (just like in this thread) who was also banned multiple times for for multiple sock puppets, trolling and given 'the last warning')..

i have little problem disagreeing with the contributors like that. and so should you if you are the moderator without an agenda.

i know for a fact that many members and current moderators feels no different. clearly, ferminal, but not YOU, did not tolerate the disruptive, obnoxious trolling.

that you chose to publicly make it personal against me and defend some of the most pernicious, proven trolls of the forum speaks to you being unfit for the job.

Not a Mod. anymore, he is free to think for himself, try it. ;)
 
Aug 9, 2010
6,255
2
17,485
Good ghod this is the biggest mess!

Firstly, I am laughing so hard , there is actual wit flying around in the air..
and folks are getting the hang of the humour..
Then suddenly it has descended into an abyss...

then more GRRR
..then total confusion.

Can some mod or whatever please just delete this whole thread?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts