- Aug 13, 2010
- 3,317
- 0
- 0
Now you are just taking the p!ss out of a serious issue.boomcie said:If the thread is not needed, it will silently slip away into oblivion like the vastly underrated "Urinating in the Shower thread"
Now you are just taking the p!ss out of a serious issue.boomcie said:If the thread is not needed, it will silently slip away into oblivion like the vastly underrated "Urinating in the Shower thread"
Don't be late Pedro said:Now you are just taking the p!ss out of a serious issue.
boomcie said:Can I please get a reasoned decision on why my thread "Toilet paper orientation and race preference" was closed?
Susan already gave a vague explanation: "Sorry, but we really don't need this thread".
I think we can all calmly agree that we do not necessarily need the "cat thread", "dog thread", "Bike advertisements and women thread", "The Mullet Thread", "Coffee Bean Recommendations thread", "Break out the fat bikes thread", "Who? LOves Their Dog as Much as Their Bike/Cycling thread" and last but not least the "Amazing staircases thread".
I could go on for ages, but one gets the point. I did not put 10 minutes in compiling the toilet paper poll just to have someone decide that my thread is less needed than a thread about stairs. Many people actually care about toilet paper orientation and I think it is up to the forum to decide whether or not we need this thread.
If the thread is not needed, it will silently slip away into oblivion like the vastly underrated "Urinating in the Shower thread", which we obviously needed more than this one.
I believe it's a little unfair to close a thread based on a random criterion like relative necessity.
Hugh Januss said:Perhaps we didn't really need the thread, although 10 people did vote in the less than 2 hours that it was open. So somebody(s) thought they needed it.
The real question is do we need a mom to tell us what we may or may not need?
Susan Westemeyer said:Whether you think you need her or not, you have her.
Hugh Januss said:Perhaps we didn't really need the thread, although 10 people did vote in the less than 2 hours that it was open. So somebody(s) thought they needed it.
The real question is do we need a mom to tell us what we may or may not need?
Susan Westemeyer said:That thread was considered inappropriate (and not just by me).
Susan
boomcie said:Holy mother of god, about 500 woman have already stated that the babes on bikes thread is inappropriate? Sadly has to go.
TheGame said:For what it is worth, I rarely get as far as putting the roll on the holder, I'm more of a floor beside the toilet kind of guy/girl (when you have a separate lavatory, reaching for the back of the door is to be honest, a drag), and frankly, the fact "floor" or "on top of the cistern" wasn't an option is enough for me to justify the moderating teams decision. Either that, or they should re-open it with the extra options added.
Susan Westemeyer said:That thread was considered inappropriate (and not just by me).
Susan
Afrank said:In what way is a thread about whether you prefer toilet paper going over or under inappropriate?![]()
Susan Westemeyer said:Whether you think you need her or not, you have her.
pedaling squares said:Boomcie - nice to know you brother, but you crossed the line when you insulted the kitty. Your days are numbered!
pedaling squares said:It was inappropriate because I found out that I like to tend to my backside in the same manner as ACF94. I don't come to this cycling forum to learn of such atrocities. This is an over and classic case of moderation where none is needed. And it made an ass wipe out of the poor moderator who contributed to the harmless thread before it was closed.
Boomcie - nice to know you brother, but you crossed the line when you insulted the kitty. Your days are numbered!
Caruut said:And here we have a mod flouting a genuine rule (not circumventing language filters) while a thread is locked with no obvious rule violations. Which rule does the thread violate dearest mods?
Don't worry. If you report my post I'll immediately edit out the naughty part/delete the postCaruut said:And here we have a mod flouting a genuine rule (not circumventing language filters) while a thread is locked with no obvious rule violations. Which rule does the thread violate dearest mods?
