- Dec 7, 2010
- 5,507
- 0
- 0
laurel1969 said:He doesn't start angry ranting when cornered but backs away quietly.
In defense of thehog, "backing away" is not exactly his style.
laurel1969 said:He doesn't start angry ranting when cornered but backs away quietly.
Benotti69 said:A big game of bull$h!t? it has you in there playing a lot.
.
Granville57 said:In defense of thehog, "backing away" is not exactly his style.
laurel1969 said:*deleted by mod*
laurel1969 said:*deleted by mod*
the sceptic said:maybe you should relax on the personal attacks if you dont want the mods to figure out which previously banned bot you are.
laurel1969 said:So which 'previously banned bot' am I?
Netserk said:Might want to read that one more time![]()
Granville57 said:Ah, of course. I was thinking WA=Washington state.
Even though I'm certain I've had PMs with SB mentioning the Aussie timezone, not to mention the obvious "Perth." Not sure why my brain failed me on this.
It only further proves my point though.
I'm still not offended by the remarks.![]()
Dear Wiggo said:He's a sandgroper, mate.![]()
Hiero2 said:About PM's: you don't have to take my word on this, you can look up the legal precedents. I have yet to get another poster who resides in a country whose legal system descends from Germanic law to LOOK THIS UP, I have looked it up for UK, US, Aus. PM's are not private. They are the property of the recipient. The recipient can do what they want to with the info. Not being a lawyer, but that is my understanding. I do not know if countries whose legal systems are descended from Germanic law are different. I expect that countries with Romance languages (France, Spain, Italy) will be similar to the UK/US law on the matter. I have been told, anecdotally, that Germanic legal systems are somewhat more inclined to protect privacy.
So, if you don't want to see it in the news tomorrow, DO NOT WRITE IT, IN ANY FORM, EVER. Good. Now, got that? I don't care if you LIKE what I've just said - this is not opinion. If you don't LISTEN and HEED what I've just said, then you are avoiding verifiable truth. Does it seem like I'm getting a bit irritable on this topic? Yeah, prescient of you. I AM getting tired of repeating this - and very tired of people not realizing how important and vital it is to realize that PRIVACY that involves two people is a secret that involves two people. It is no longer a secret. Period.
“Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead.”
―]
I have had numerous discussions with Hiero2 about this issue on other threads, and via email. With it always coming back to a cultural difference on interpretation of "private message". I meant nothing else than that, and am sorry if any of you took offence.
the sceptic said:mods take themselves way too seriously around here.
Dear Wiggo said:He's a sandgroper, mate.![]()
ChewbaccaD said:...hey mods, when are you getting back to RR and I about the new "The only subject appropriate for this forum is toast with pictures of famous people burned into them" idea?
Granville57 said:
ChewbaccaD said:Seriously, how could anyone eat that?
Granville57 said:With a few slices of American cheese and some Russian dressing, I've heard that it goes down without too much difficulty.
JRTinMA said:Can we keep this thread about the worthless mods. the current posting trend of Mods and sycophants energetically posting together is making me ill. Get a private chat room.
ChewbaccaD said:More fiber in your diet, and a good walk will help you out.
Granville57 said:not to mention the obvious "Perth."
Hugh Januss said:A good **** might help him more.
I meant to say "whanck". If you get my drift.
Hugh Januss said:Maybe he was trying to say he carries a perth?
