- Jun 14, 2010
- 34,930
- 60
- 22,580
Amsterhammer said:This is not personally aimed at anyone, I just thought it was funny.
![]()
Im fbk friends with Eshnar and i tell you right now, that is exactly what he looks like.
Amsterhammer said:This is not personally aimed at anyone, I just thought it was funny.
![]()
l.Harm said:Not sure this is the right thread.
I noticed some mods/admins/whatever warned some users via the Visitor Message which can be seen by everybody. Isn't it more appropriate to do this in a personal message?![]()
ebandit said:i agree...a mod left me visitor message which while not a warning was concerning a sensitive matter. i would have preferred NOT having message left in such a wayL
Netserk said:You (all of you together) really post a lot of hilarious crap. I also enjoy to read some of the b!tch fights![]()
![]()
l.Harm said:...Not sure what you're trying to say though.
Originally Posted by sittingbison
Dear IHarm,
You have received a warning at CyclingNews Forum.
Reason:
-------
trolling
(IHarms trolling post)
Iharm your post was trolling, please desist in future
cheers
bison
All the best,
CyclingNews Forum
sittingbison said:mods can either send you a message manually (to PM or visitor) or they can use an infraction system which is largely automated. When this is used its clear its automated, it says something like:
I am not sure where this message ends up, in the PM box or the visitor box
sittingbison said:mods can either send you a message manually (to PM or visitor) or they can use an infraction system which is largely automated. When this is used its clear its automated, it says something like:
I am not sure where this message ends up, in the PM box or the visitor box
I don't wear glassesThe Hitch said:Im fbk friends with Eshnar and i tell you right now, that is exactly what he looks like.
TheGame said:So it's okay to circumvent the ****ing word censor now![]()
sittingbison said:mods can either send you a message manually (to PM or visitor) or they can use an infraction system which is largely automated. When this is used its clear its automated, it says something like:
I am not sure where this message ends up, in the PM box or the visitor box
That we'll never ever use Visitor Messages to warn other members again. I have deleted those I could find, but if you see any I haven't deleted, then please PM me.l.Harm said:PM box. So that's the solution then?
Netserk said:IMO the biggest perks of being a mod is the ability to read all the deleted material, and getting to know the other mods much better.
You (all of you together) really post a lot of hilarious crap. I also enjoy to read some of the b!tch fights![]()
![]()
TheGame said:So it's okay to circumvent the ****ing word censor now![]()
Netserk said:It depends on witch words and in what situation.
Some riders are from Pakistan. Instead of ****stan.
sittingbison said:I wonder if that's how the infraction system works?
TheGame said:Right, im very confused. Perhaps you could please clarify this for me.
So it is acceptable to avoid the word censor to write the word b!tch
But it is not acceptable to circumvent the word censor to write the word related to fornicating
So the rules regarding deliberately circumventing the word censor depend on the word?
Could we perhaps have a list of words that we are allowed to use, and a list of the words we aren't just to clear up any confusion.
In:
B!tch
Pakistan
D!ck
Out:
****ing
For example, am I allowed to say Pu55y? Its all rather confusing.
Ripper said:Well there is also
a$$
D00shbag
Sh!t
Turd
Hugh Januss said:As well as mot#er foo(kin son @f a beetch,
but I prefer not to go there.
probably the trolling got unbearable... even to them...gooner said:Why did the Kimmage thread get closed?
Did CN get approached about it?
thirteen said:probably the trolling got unbearable... even to them...
it did kind of come across as spam, actually... but Antoine Vayer is someone who's work i am interested in and respect.Fearless Greg Lemond said:Ahum, where did that 21 counts topic go? Seen as spam?
