Modestly clothed women

[Anonymous]

we need to up the stakes

 

[forty four]

Finally a place for the Duggars on Cyclingnews! The father is a former state senator. Yes, she delivered every one of those kiddos. This picture is old - they have 19 kids now. That's their house behind them.

And the Duggars' good friends, the Bates Family. Mama and Daddy and their umpteen modestly-dressed kids - and she delivered every one too.

that is disgusting and offensive to look at religious people suck.

 

[Race Radio]

we need to up the stakes

Nothing more modest then drunk English women

 

[forty four]

Hey, you can't lust at what you can't see. We have two choices according to people like those who are offended by threads like Babes:
1. We can stop finding women sexually attractive, especially their breasts and vaginas. If we just stop feeling aroused by those things (even when fully covered), they will be happy.
2. We can impose Shariah Law, and cover them in burkas so that our eyes will not lust.

Sorry, but the first is physiologically impossible considering that there is an innate chemical reaction necessary for the continued survival of our species at work. Good luck turning off that switch.

All we are left with is the burka. It is the only option truly under our control.

its funny its always the unattractive women who hate stuff like this they are not liked or lusted after by men so on some level they are bitter and jealous of attractive women and hate men looking at them. its all about bitterness and jealousy no less no more that is the truth they can say otherwise but it is so transparent and total b.s.

 

[Fourier]

I'd like to comment but I'll let Reiner Wolfcastle handle this one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juFZh92MUOY

 

[trompe le monde]

 

[Anonymous]

its funny its always the unattractive women who hate stuff like this they are not liked or lusted after by men so on some level they are bitter and jealous of attractive women and hate men looking at them. its all about bitterness and jealousy no less no more that is the truth they can say otherwise but it is so transparent and total b.s.

That is not what I am saying at all. It has nothing to do with attractive or unattractive. It has to do with some women believing that because of their opinion of what is and is not appropriate behavior for a man, they have the right to deem something "offensive" and unworthy of viewing.

Women should have equal everything. Pay, opportunity, you name it. What they do not have the right to do is attempt to counter act basic human male instinct, not only because it is impossible to overcome, but also because they should busy themselves with their own foibles.

It is the same reason I detest the anti-homosexual crowd. My sexuality is mine. There will always be human beings who go out of bounds on ANY human emotion or endeavor, WOMEN INCLUDED. Trust me, it is not limited to SEX. Humans exceed healthy bounds in terms of greed, lust, pride, gluttony, envy, anger, and sloth. We all do to a greater or lesser degree in one or more of those. There are those who go to extremes in terms of those human frailties. Does that mean everyone should be branded? Those of us who have viewed that thread have been deemed as having "demeaning" attitudes to women. I would suggest that is as offensive as any tit shot. Just because I look at a woman and experience a release of chemicals that is pleasurable (biological necessity for continuing the species) DOES NOT mean that I believe women only serve to as eye candy. It DOES NOT mean that I believe that women hold a lower place in society. It DOES NOT mean that I believe women are inferior intellectually. It DOES NOT mean that I think only ugly women dislike anything. WHAT IT MEANS IS THAT I ENJOY THE WAY WOMEN LOOK! ****ING SUE ME!

 

[Libertine Seguros]

Vive la France.

 

[bobs nob]

That is not what I am saying at all. It has nothing to do with attractive or unattractive. It has to do with some women believing that because of their opinion of what is and is not appropriate behavior for a man, they have the right to deem something "offensive" and unworthy of viewing.

Women should have equal everything. Pay, opportunity, you name it. What they do not have the right to do is attempt to counter act basic human male instinct, not only because it is impossible to overcome, but also because they should busy themselves with their own foibles.

It is the same reason I detest the anti-homosexual crowd. My sexuality is mine. There will always be human beings who go out of bounds on ANY human emotion or endeavor, WOMEN INCLUDED. Trust me, it is not limited to SEX. Humans exceed healthy bounds in terms of greed, lust, pride, gluttony, envy, anger, and sloth. We all do to a greater or lesser degree in one or more of those. There are those who go to extremes in terms of those human frailties. Does that mean everyone should be branded? Those of us who have viewed that thread have been deemed as having "demeaning" attitudes to women. I would suggest that is as offensive as any tit shot. Just because I look at a woman and experience a release of chemicals that is pleasurable (biological necessity for continuing the species) DOES NOT mean that I believe women only serve to as eye candy. It DOES NOT mean that I believe that women hold a lower place in society. It DOES NOT mean that I believe women are inferior intellectually. It DOES NOT mean that I think only ugly women dislike anything. WHAT IT MEANS IS THAT I ENJOY THE WAY WOMEN LOOK! ****ING SUE ME!

You both make good points, I've never seen one of these women who crusade against men's supposed 'denigration' of women who imho warrants a first look, never mind a second, so yes, the bitterness and jealousy drives a lot of it.

Women intellectually inferior? Hah! In my dreams, never won an argument with my wife, never will. All I ever need to do to instigate a nasty no-holds barred, is-this-marriage-worth-saving brawl of words is to prove that woman wrong. I wish I was half her equal in an argument.

I don't think whoever complained about the thread realizes we can at one moment look at women as objects to fulfill our carnal fantasies and at the same time as people to be respected, loved and to be emotionally intimate with in a way that doing so with a man (for me at least) is inconceivable.

I am sad to say that there is a segment of the female population that must live in an emotionally barren wasteland because they feel that an entire 3 billion strong gender will never see them as a sex object. Yet somehow, as a man, I deal with it with a smile on my face! Life's just not fair for any of us in some ways.

 

[bobs nob]

 

[bobs nob]

 

[bobs nob]

 

[bobs nob]

 

[Anonymous]

the thread reminds me of when I used to tell my 8 year old daughter she couldn't do something....

 

[Anonymous]

Maybe modesty is like beauty, in the eye of the beholder?

very much like "The Cav Salute", but not.

 

[Anonymous]

You both make good points, I've never seen one of these women who crusade against men's supposed 'denigration' of women who imho warrants a first look, never mind a second, so yes, the bitterness and jealousy drives a lot of it.

Women intellectually inferior? Hah! In my dreams, never won an argument with my wife, never will. All I ever need to do to instigate a nasty no-holds barred, is-this-marriage-worth-saving brawl of words is to prove that woman wrong. I wish I was half her equal in an argument.

I don't think whoever complained about the thread realizes we can at one moment look at women as objects to fulfill our carnal fantasies and at the same time as people to be respected, loved and to be emotionally intimate with in a way that doing so with a man (for me at least) is inconceivable.

I am sad to say that there is a segment of the female population that must live in an emotionally barren wasteland because they feel that an entire 3 billion strong gender will never see them as a sex object. Yet somehow, as a man, I deal with it with a smile on my face! Life's just not fair for any of us in some ways.

And the reason they can't.....<drum roll>...........is because THEY ARE WOMEN!!!!!!! DING DING DING!!!

That is why it disturbs me. You have rules for behavior dictated by one sex to another...hmm....I wonder if that is one of the things they fight against also

 

[Anonymous]

and while Im thinking of it

just what this 19th century woman have to do with the bike? Anything?

 

[bobs nob]

just what this 19th century woman have to do with the bike? Anything?

Brewerjeff (may I call you BJ ?), take your lustful sinning ways elsewhere, these immodest harlots have no place in our politically correct world.

(Unless it's OK with whoever had the problem with the other thread because we all have seen that unless they are ok with it, then it has to go.)

Now excuse me while I go read up on Onanism.

 

[Maxiton]

This one's actually kind of hot. Military girls A-Go-Go.

 

[Maxiton]

Here ya go.

 

[Hugh Januss]

It's true, men and women are not always on the same page.

 

[Maxiton]

OMG. What's that doing here?

 

[Maxiton]

BANNED since 1878.

 

[Maxiton]

Doping sister.

 

[Maxiton]