Modestly clothed women

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 15, 2010
833
0
0
mennonite-lady-with-bicycle.small_-500x332.jpg
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
You know, if the mods are going to allow "offended" members to dictate what is and is not appropriate, maybe we could solve the problem with the burka. I mean, the PC bull**** police want to make sure that lustful observance is squashed; I say, they are no different from the cultures that insist on the burka. When I say "modestly clothed" I mean a BURKA! Nothing else is appropriate.
Hissa_1602534c.jpg
 
May 15, 2010
833
0
0
Thoughtforfood said:
You know, if the mods are going to allow "offended" members to dictate what is and is not appropriate, maybe we could solve the problem by the burka. I mean, the PC bull**** police want to make sure that lustful observance is squashed. I say, they are no different from the cultures that insist on the burka. When I say "modestly clothed" I mean a BURKA! Nothing else is appropriate.
Hissa_1602534c.jpg

Shariah law, keeping women down....and I mean DOWN...for over 1000 years.
 
May 15, 2010
833
0
0
Oh shoot, couldn't resist, this one is showing major skin

kathy_bicycle_lady_copy.jpg


...AND a trek....ughhh what is their to love?
 
May 15, 2010
833
0
0
It's just a matter of time....

jes a matter of time before the 3rd from left dude asks 4th from left babe for coffee....he's a wolf

faculty-scholars-2009.jpg
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
bobs *** said:
Shariah law, keeping women down....and I mean DOWN...for over 1000 years.

Hey, you can't lust at what you can't see. We have two choices according to people like those who are offended by threads like Babes:
1. We can stop finding women sexually attractive, especially their breasts and vaginas. If we just stop feeling aroused by those things (even when fully covered), they will be happy.
2. We can impose Shariah Law, and cover them in burkas so that our eyes will not lust.

Sorry, but the first is physiologically impossible considering that there is an innate chemical reaction necessary for the continued survival of our species at work. Good luck turning off that switch.:rolleyes:

All we are left with is the burka. It is the only option truly under our control.
 
May 15, 2010
833
0
0
Thoughtforfood said:
Hey, you can't lust at what you can't see. We have two choices according to people like those who are offended by threads like Babes:
1. We can stop finding women sexually attractive, especially their breasts and vaginas. If we just stop feeling aroused by those things (even when fully covered), they will be happy.
2. We can impose Shariah Law, and cover them in burkas so that our eyes will not lust.

Sorry, but the first is physiologically impossible considering that there is an innate chemical reaction necessary for the continued survival of our species at work. Good luck turning off that switch.:rolleyes:

All we are left with is the burka. It is the only option truly under our control.

TOUCHE. but....Babe photos only. Your retort belongs in the modestly offensive and or controversial thread. If you can get a word in between the brownies with walnuts or plain hysteria.